Reviewed by Glenn Erickson
A magnificent epic battle film of a famous seige of only a couple of hundred British soldiers
by thousands of Zulu warriors, Zulu has long been a favorite 'boys own' true adventure
tale. Released in 70mm in 1964, and directed by the expatriate blacklisted American director
Cy Endfield (Try and Get Me,
Mysterious Island), Zulu
leaned a bit toward
an all-out glorification of the colonial forces, and military gallantry in general, but the
bare facts of the battle are impressive on their own.
In 1964, nobody expected an expensive epic to be critical of British military history. Endfield
saved that for 1979's completely different political climate. His
was a prequel that explained the fighting that occurred the day before Zulu's battle at
Rorke's Drift. In Zulu, the previous encounter at Isandlwanda is described as solely a
massacre of 1200 troops at the hands of an overwhelming number of Zulus, and audiences assumed
that the events were some sort of massive native uprising. As Zulu Dawn later clarified,
what actually happened was an unprovoked invasion of Zululand by the governor of the pre-South
African Natal province. Thanks to the incompetence and arrogance of Lord Chelmsford, the majority of
the invaders were routed and annihilated.
Before Vietnam, such disastrous folly wasn't considered a subject for good entertainment. The
desperate siege at Rorke's drift, with its obvious bravery and gallantry, was perfect. With an
intelligent script and complete historical accuracy, the battle was restaged on a massive scale.
Thousands of Zulu tribesmen served as extras, and their chief played his ancestor, Czetsuayo.
The battles are breathtaking, even if it's hard to undestand why the Zulu commanders only send
a few hundred footsoldiers against Rorke's drift in any one assault, allowing the defenders to
cut them down
one after another. At Isandlwanda, armed only with spears and asagai swords, they took the heavily
armed British the only way they could, overwhelming them with sheer numbers. Perhaps Czetsuwayo wasn't
prepared to lose large numbers of fighters again; or maybe there were tribal or religious factors
The politics of the fighting may be fudged, but the internal story of the British defenders is
much more critical and incisive. The two
acting lieutenants, played by Michael Caine and co-producer Stanley Baker, squabble over seniority
issues to determine who's in command. The discipline among the ranks is astounding, with 200 surely-miserable
men quietly following orders and standing in rigid formations while awaiting battle commands.
With almost eerie calm, the color sergeant played by Nigel Green keeps the men in line and focused, and
has time to deal with skittish privates (some as young as 17) and the troublesome missionaries
played by Jack Hawkins and Ulla Jacobsen. The corps doctor, Patrick Magee, is a standout, as is
sick-house malingerer James Booth.
The picture does a fine job of contrasting the British military system with that of the Zulu army, which
follows a similar command structure, and itself is composed of 'traditions': tribal chants that
help gear them up for their withering attacks. At one point the enemies trade songs across the
battlefield. The final minutes have a stirring evocation of the mutual
respect of warriors & military traditions, British and Zulu, that places both outside political
considerations. However, what we mostly remember is the old Colonial story: we identify with a small
number of white fighters as they annihilate many hundreds of non-white opponents, about whom we
learn very little.
The Roan Group's DVD of Zulu, a public domain film, is only marginally acceptable. Far better
than earlier budget releases that spat out the same ugly pan'n scan print, Roan's letterboxed,
flat picture is reasonably good-looking but lacks fine color and detail. The encoding also
barely makes the grade, as the picture details break down into lines and digital patterning at any monitor
size over 26 inches or so. There's hardly any damage or blemishes on the print used, but occasional
flaws look like old tape dropouts and hits ... as if this were mastered from an old 1" tape of
better-than-average quality. A special logo claims that the show was remastered from 'original film
elements', and perhaps it was, but the results are more in line with the quality we were used to with
laserdiscs, not DVD.
The audio is strong and clear, but I don't think I heard any stereo separation. There are no
subtitles, closed-captions, or audio choices. The only extra is a text section that repeats the cast
and credits, and offers several pages of interesting, well-chosen production facts.
Front Row Entertainment released another flat letterboxed version, that Savant has not seen.
MGM, which holds actual pre-print film elements for Zulu, has announced that it is
working on a disc of this title, and it will possibly arrive in 2003. Note, 9/22/05: There is now a far superior MGM version of this film out that permanently eclipses this Roan disc. The one disappointment is its audio track, which is straight mono as opposed to the multi-channel stereo found on the R2 Disc. Although one would like to blame someone, it's hard to know who. MGM archivists continually asked Paramount, which held the elements, for the stereo tracks and were told they didn't exist. Then Paramount's R2 disc appeared. Although deliberate sabotage comes to mind, it apparently was a mistake of miscommunication -- the Paramount contact honestly thought the track didn't exist. Among the studios, the sharing of elements for films with split rights is normally a civilized process.
On a scale of Excellent, Good, Fair, and Poor,
Packaging: Keep case
Reviewed: October 25, 2002
DVD Savant Text © Copyright 2007 Glenn Erickson