|
|
Reviewed by Glenn Erickson
The cult of Sam Peckinpah has waned of late, mainly because the excesses of violence that marked his
best films have long since been eclipsed by decades of graphic action films. But none can touch
his best work, because Peckinpah had a theme and an attitude that were more important to him than
success itself. Violence eventually became his only stock-in-trade. There's no denying that
his masterpiece The Wild Bunch is a film torn between character study and a glee at blowing
away audience preconceptions of what real killing is like, and Peckinpah made a name for himself
by pontificating on the subject of violence for every reporter and interviewer he met.
Away from the Western genre, where he cleaned house with the traditions of John Ford, Peckinpah's
next major move was to England, for a violent fantasy even more central to his personal
philosophy, and more accessible to contemporary audiences. 1971 was the year that the
production code taboos were finally broken in creative ways, where excess didn't necessarily mean
exploitation - in pictures like The Devils and A Clockwork Orange. Unfettered by good
taste or studio conventions, Sam fashioned a nasty tale that brought out male rage and waved it
around as a challenge to the universe. Some of Straw Dogs is just as poorly judged as
Peckinpah's later, patchy work, but for the sheer power to rev up the bloodlust in an audience, there
had yet been nothing like it.
Synopsis:
Meek mathematician David Sumner (Dustin Hoffman), working in supposed seclusion,
has taken up residence in the small Cornwall town where his young wife Amy (Susan George) was raised,
and immediately becomes the butt of jokes for the local toughs, who see him as a milquetoast and
Amy as fair game to prove their macho superiority. Immature and frustrated, Amy encourages the
attentions of the louts who have come to work on their roof, precipitating a series of harrowing
events - of which a brutal rape is only the beginning. Amidst it all, David discovers his own sense
of primitive outrage, and his own acumen for violence.
Savant saw (the shorter American cut of) Straw Dogs at least five times on its release in
1971; I had just become a life convert to The Wild Bunch and was eager to bolster my
longhaired, unemployable film-student impotence with a strong dose of Peckin-testosterone. I soon
stopped attending the kind of films that attracted audiences in need of violent catharsis,
but the screenings of Straw Dogs I remember were marked by genuine bloodlust from
theaters-full of people who shouted at Dustin Hoffman to blow people away.
I remember hearing cries of, 'Kill the bitch!' more than once.
Peckinpah impressed critics and producers with his gift of directing ordinary scenes with uncommon
sensitivity, and to effortlessly create tension and
conflict. Some of his highest praise was earned for television shows like The Westerner
and the TV play Noon Wine. To its credit, Straw Dogs has that quality, a sharp
dramatic edge that grabs the attention and holds on tight. The introduction of the basic situation
in the Cornwall town, with its jobless malcontents and bitter pub crawlers reacting with predictable
meanness to the intrusion of wimpy American Dustin Hoffman, is economical and effective. Susan George's
insolent cheap-tease
Amy Sumner may be an inflammatory image to feminists, but Peckinpah and scenarist David Zelag Goodman
(The Stranglers of Bombay)
deserve credit for having the guts to depict such a destructive female character. PC or no PC,
created by male oppression or not, Amy Sumners do exist, and their taunting can indeed
cause havoc. Straw Dogs even has an Amy Junior character in a younger local tease, who clearly
sees the American's wife as a role model: in a screenplay perhaps a little top-heavy with symbolic
portent, the two of them are introduced carrying a giant iron man-trap, the kind used to catch poachers.
This teen tease is associated with the village kids seen playing in
a graveyard, continuing the Buñuel-Los Olvidados link to The Wild Bunch: children
are neither innocent nor virtuous by nature.
Straw Dogs boils two pots of discontent at the same time. Troublemaker Amy stirs up
bad vibes at home with her taunts and jabs at David's lack of macho possessiveness. A generic
'intellectual' meant to symbolize everything liberal and civilized about non-violence and tolerance,
poor David is the repository for everything Peckinpah sees as lacking in modern Americans -
he's a cheek-turning wimpus who doesn't understand that this 'older' (and by
Straw Dogs's thin logic, more primitive) culture operates on an Alley Oop level of brute
force. And Amy is no different: constantly called an animal and compared to the cat, she saunters
and flaunts herself in petulant protest. If Peckinpah used his Westerns to disembowel the John Ford
notions of an honorable and utopia-building society, he's here doing a hatchet job on the quaint
fantasies of
The Quiet Man.
The other source of tension in Straw Dogs is the excellently rendered social situation. An
editor friend of mine was in Ireland dating a local girl - the local 'lads' let him buy beers at the
pub and then showed their contempt by battering his rental car to an undriveable pulp while he slept.
Peckinpah's quaint town has its sheriff-like constable and its ineffectual churchman, but
neither can control the 30ish young men, frustrated by unemployment and ready to lash out to take
what they want. Even if Amy had handled the situation better, she and David might still expect
trouble, but her ambivalence towards Charlie Venner's (Del Henney) attentions invites
sexual violence. Charlie's friends vary in their hostility and charm; one is a 'ratter' who goads
the others on. And they have backup in the drunken Tom Hedden, an aging beast of a man so maladjusted
he baits the constable and threatens to brain the bartender over a pint of spirits. Like papa
Clanton in My Darling Clementine, his rebelliousness gives the younger men an authority
figure to help them set aside their better natures. They don't need to be united by blood oaths
like the Hammonds or the Confederates of Major Dundee - they're an informal group of
similarly resentful louts.
The second act shockeroo is a rape scene that, even when trimmed, was rougher
than anything yet seen on American screens. Amy is attacked by Venner, but is shown to clearly
want him, a nasty gauntlet Peckinpah throws at the foot of the then-new feminist movement. She pays
dearly when a second rapist moves in to violate her anally - with her previous 'beau' held
off at shotgun point. She's thus damned thrice over as 1) a pussy tease (pardon) to poor cuckolded
David, 2) a faithless bitch in her open invitation and eventual welcoming of rape, and 3) the
worthless tramp who is given what she deserves in the roughest way possible. Pauline Kael, if I
recall correctly, labeled Straw Dogs a fascist film for this scene, setting it next to
Dirty Harry as a manipulative
counterattack on liberal values. Unfortunately, violence and sexual sadism were winning in
public approval that year.
Naturally, all is set on a spiral to a bloodbath - the situation is credible enough, and complex
enough, to engage anyone. The trigger turns out not to be Amy, but Henry Niles, a mental deficient
and town fool who accidentally steps forward to kill like Steinbeck's Lennie, perhaps inspired by
the sexual violence all around him. Protecting Niles from Tom Hedden's lynch mob provides American
Sumner with the moral hook that all Americans seek - the pretext to take a stand for rigid
righteousness. David Sumner finds himself defending his own
self-identity, first with stubborness, and then with grave oaths - the kind that in Peckinpah's world
can lead only to violent death. Hedden's lynch mob lays siege to Sumner's strong-as-a-castle stone
house, and the truth comes out about Amy's connection to the boys outside when she tries to let them
in. Alley Oo - I mean David - grabs her by the hair and orders her upstairs where she belongs,
locks Niles in the bathroom and prepares for battle.
"I will not allow violence against this house" is Sumner's oath, one that every Anglo-American
male has entertained when contemplating riots or civil insurrection. David's not flush with
guns, but he's got a massive door that can't be battered in, water and lye to boil, and a number
of other improvised weapons to wield. With the entire audience behind this Lochinvar as he battles foes
outside and an intimate traitor within, the stage is set for a killing spree we can all get behind ...
as in United We Stand.
The ending is a hip combination of directorial strength and weakness. Amy gets left behind with a
houseful of stiffs while David takes Niles to the authorities, mumbling a fairly lame 'I don't know
where home is anymore' line that tries too hard to be enigmatic.
Straw Dogs' excellent character direction is periodically undercut by a new Peckinpah tendency
to lean on obvious symbols and lame directorial touches, such as the 'clacking ball bearing' novelty
item on David's desk. As David and Amy argue, it clacks away as a detail in the frame, an okay
echo of their conflict. Peckinpah ruins the moment by later cutting to it for a closeup, grabbing us
by the back of the neck and pushing our noses into his symbol. Bad form, and the sign of a director
who's now decided he's an 'auteur'.
But this violent film heightened and honed Peckinpah's montage cutting to delirious heights. When
the distraught post-rape Amy sits with her husband watching a miserable church
variety show, Peckinpah and his editors intercut violent flashbacks to the rape with Amy's reactions
to the performances onstage, raising the tempo until the tension in the cross-cut scenes bleed into
each other. It's showy, but it works like a charm. 1
In 1971, the dynamic flow of violent action seen here was hypnotizing, sustained for a full reel
and more
intense and less lyrical than the aesthetic ballets of death in The Wild Bunch. Seeing the
film again in 1980, it still carried a basic, undeniable kick. But action cutting has become so fast
in recent years, with martial arts and crime films artificially stimulating us to higher levels of
agitation, that it's possible that jaded 2003 viewers might wonder what the fuss was about. I still
think the immediacy of a drunk getting his foot blown off, and the identifiably real idea of being
snared and wired to a window casing lined with jagged glass, still carries a jolt. 2
For Savant, Straw Dogs is Peckinpah's last good violent film. The pretension factor and a
cartoonish awkwardness cripple The Getaway until a by-the-numbers slow-mo bullet count factor
takes over. Junior Bonner is a fine low-key drama, but still burdened with post-Hud
pretensions. After that, there's the out-of-control lunacy of Bring Me the Head of Alfredo
Garcia, which with its 'Poe meets Harry Dobbs' mayhem, should have been a classic, but instead
plays like a crude plea to Stop Me Before I Direct More Movies. Unlike many, I see only a few
scattered grace notes in Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid. The rest is repetitive boredom and
more pretension. After that, The Killer Elite is a bad self-parody, and the rest is downhill,
with the ambitious Cross of Iron a disappointing muddle. Straw Dogs is ugly and morally
questionable, but it's still Peckinpah working at the height of his powers, expressing his
antisocial outrage in original and interesting ways.
Criterion's Special Edition DVD of Straw Dogs will hit the spot for the Peckinpah faithful.
The transfer is excellent, eclipsing the earlier Anchor Bay disc that came out before that company
had established its high standards. The extras are many and thorough, starting with a scholarly
audio commentary. There's an isolated music and effects track that will partly compensate for my
foolishly trading in my old laser disc with its discrete Jerry Fielding score. Two new interviews
debut here with Susan George and producer Daniel Melnick, yet another faithful Peckinpah supporter
he self-destructively turned against. The 1974 Playboy Peckinpah interview is reprinted,
and another gallery includes his acidic responses to film critics and ordinary viewer criticism.
A featurette from the time profiles Dustin Hoffman, and shows Peckinpah directing (he looks deceptively
sane). What looks like footage for an unfinished show is some raw B&W behind the scenes
material. There are also some trailers and tv spots.
The big show is a strong 82-minute docu called Sam Peckinpah: Man of Iron produced by the
BBC and partly line-produced by Katy Haber, Peckinpah's frequent assistant in the 70s. She and a
dozen other actors, writers and Sam fans (like Mort Sahl) paint a picture of a beloved unholy monster.
Writer James Silke's testimony of
his attempts to revive the broken director is heartbreaking, but many of the others revel in
explaining what an all-consuming rattlesnake Peckinpah was. James Coburn laughs, Kris Kristofferson offers
songs (good ones) to Sam's vices, and actor R.G. Armstrong will shake your television with his
earth-shattering oratory. A disclaimer up front explains that the docu has necessarily been shortened
by the removal of almost all its film clips from studios that would ask a killer's bounty for their
use. Interestingly, the deletions make the docu easier to watch for us Peckinpah fans that have seen the
films so often we resent having them interpreted for us. Likewise, Jason Robards' lighthearted
reading of selected Peckinpah letters works much better than the fawning, adulatory attitude struck
by Ed Harris in the Wild Bunch short subject from a few years back.
By all accounts Peckinpah was a great talent who could easily have parlayed his
cult popularity into a much more prolific and rewarding career. Drugs, drink, paranoia and an inability
to get along with people short-circuited all that, and we're left contemplating his masterpieces,
embarrassments, and the ruins of a few pictures that can still be restored.
On a scale of Excellent, Good, Fair, and Poor,
Straw Dogs rates:
Movie: Excellent
Video: Excellent
Sound: Excellent
Supplements: 82 min docu, featurette, commentary by Stephen Prince, isolated music and effects,
Dustin Hoffman featurette, behind the scenes footage, interviews with Susan George and Daniel Melnick,
Peckinpah correspondence, reprinted Playboy article, essay by poet Joshua Clover.
Packaging: Double disc NexPak case
Reviewed: March 9, 2003
Footnotes:
1. this cutting pattern was intended to be used by Peckinpah
in the legendary deleted opening to Major Dundee, where an Apache raid interrupts a
frontier Halloween party. Kids run around dressed as ghosts and Indians, as adults carouse and soldiers sing,
all intercut madly until glimpses of very-convincing Apache makeup are seen - and when it is suddenly
revealed that real Indians have infiltrated the party, we're as surprised as the rapidly-slaughtered
homesteaders and soldiers. Return
2. Feature film editor and pal Steve Nielson found another big difference
between the fast cutting here and in contemporary films - Peckinpah's endless flow of cuts use mostly
static, often locked-down angles. There's motion on masters, yes, but not the 'every cut is a movie
unto itself' Michael Bay ethic. This can be good when the angles are rightly chosen - but the fact is
that a few details of the final battle become confusing. Despite Peckinpah's attempt to spell
everything out clearly, we're not always sure how many assailants are still functional, where they
are, or who they are. Return
DVD Savant Text © Copyright 2007 Glenn Erickson
|