"All's good if it's excessive."
Please Note: The images used here are promotional stills and are not taken from the Blu-ray edition under review.
Once upon a time, Criterion spine #17 was the rarest of the collection*. The early release of Pier Paolo Pasolini's 1976 shocker SalÚ, or the 120 Days of Sodom was the one of the first discs to go out of print for the label, disappearing not long after it had first been issued. Copies of the release sold for several hundred dollars on eBay, and fans created online guides to steer potential buyers through the murky waters of knock-offs and bootlegs.
When I was working on building a complete Criterion library some ten years ago, SalÚ was always the one that eluded me. Both the cost-prohibitive mark-up and the movie's scandalous reputation made me gun shy. Eventually, I bought a dubious Chinese facsimile so I could actually watch the thing. My hope was, if SalÚ was as off-putting as everyone said, viewing it would convince me that it was not something I needed to drop major coin on.
The theory panned out. One time through with SalÚ was enough for me. It was not a movie I ever felt the need to see again. I finally bought the legitimate reissue a couple of years ago, but I never even opened it. It was gathering dust on my shelf, still wrapped in plastic, when the Blu-Ray came through. I guess enough time had passed. I was finally going to watch SalÚ a second time after all...
Pasolini's film in is an infamous slab of transgressive art. Inspired by the work of the Marquis de Sade, the controversial Italian director leveled his aim on his country's ruling class. Though set during the years during World War II when Italy was occupied and the Fascist government colluded with the Nazis, SalÚ takes place away from the combat, isolated to a sprawling, secluded villa owned by a shadowy collective of privileged dignitaries. These men have formed a secret pact, marrying each other's daughters as an old-school symbol of joint power. The four of them are intense libertines, and they have kidnapped nine teenage boys and nine teenage girls, all virgins, and taken them to this hidden house to engage in their every depraved fantasy. With them are adolescent thugs who act as their enforcers and aging prostitutes who stimulate the conversation by sharing the greatest hits of their illustrious careers satisfying the kinky fetishes of other powerful men. The men listen to these stories of indulgence and then indulge themselves with their captives.
SalÚ is essentially an escalating chain of humiliation and degradation. As the days wear on, the humiliations inflicted on the kidnapped adolescents gets worse and worse. Religion is banished, as is any display of emotion. If any of the prisoners break these rules, their names go into a little black book. When the excursion is over, the list of wrongdoers will receive a special punishment. Indeed, that perversion of justice is the climax of SalÚ, an orgy of torture, rape, and death. It's a bizarre concept to wrap your head around. These children have been violated, forced to eat human feces, and beaten, and yet in this upside-down mini society, they are the sinners. You'd think there was no penalty left, yet for Pasolini, no matter how cruel a human can be, there is always someone more cruel, always a deeper level of selfishness and evil that man can sink to.
It can be hard to judge button-pushing art, especially once some time has passed. What was shocking and meaningful in 1976 may not have the same impact or relevance in 2011. SalÚ, or the 120 Days of Sodom still has the power to disgust. I retched more than once while watching it and frequently squinted or covered my eyes to obscure some of the more terrible depictions. So, I guess that is a win against the belief that we, as a filmgoing public, have been desensitized over the years by increased sex and violence in entertainment. SalÚ still has the power to make me sick.
On the other hand, it no longer has the power to shock. Maybe it's hard to compete in an age where we have something like The Human Centipede, the goal post has definitely been moved when it comes to deranged concepts. Or maybe it's that Pasolini's technique is so transparent, it's hard to take his film entirely seriously. Yes, much of what he shows on screen is gross, but some of it is also outright ridiculous. A man in leather panties and dog collar talking about how much he likes anuses and being urinated on may be a very real fetish, but the use of such images in SalÚ seems more like juvenile rabble-rousing than it does a mature exploration of challenging world views.
Which isn't to say that SalÚ, or the 120 Days of Sodom is without subtext. For as much as Pasolini is getting his jollies by creating this tableau of human indignity, he also is trying to make a point about the corrupt nature of governance and the true motivations behind fascism. Any will to power, his script suggests, is essentially selfish, no matter how much the would-be leaders crow about the greater good. In amongst the sex talk here, the abusers espouse theories about politics and human nature that seemingly explain and justify their actions. Pasolini undercuts their self-belief by demonstrating that these are just excuses they make in order to satisfy their own base urges. Unsurprisingly, the more harsh things get, survival tactics get more desperate. Prisoners turn on each other. Mankind is its own worst enemy.
Which is where I would guess Pasolini is really coming from. His contempt for the Fascists is equal to his contempt for the common man. SalÚ, or the 120 Days of Sodom is the product of a severe misanthrope, one whom I suspect wants to get back at a populace that has misunderstood and persecuted him. He is serving us the cinematic meal he thinks we deserve in a way that is almost ironic: he decries cruelty and humiliation by beating up his audience using all the tactics his villains use. You will know what he means because he will make you experience it.
It's not a particularly complex response to a complicated world. Were Pasolini's filmmaking skills not so refined, I'm not sure we'd still be watching and debating SalÚ, or the 120 Days of Sodom all these years later. It's a well-made movie even if I don't think it's a very good one. I know it has its defenders, and to be honest, I take no issue with that, just as I think Pasolini wouldn't take issue with my negative analysis. SalÚ is meant to be visceral, and so any visceral reaction on the part of the viewership means success. For my money, though, a better film would have moved me in a more profound manner. It would have still caused me to look away, but it would also inspire me to think about why I had done so. The deepest question I took away from SalÚ, or the 120 Days of Sodom had nothing to do with narrative or thematic meaning; rather, I just kept wondering how you cast a movie like this. How do you go about finding actors who will read the script and say, "Oh, you want me to strip down to nothing, pretend to get sodomized, and sit in a barrel of excrement? Sounds like the role of a lifetime!"
* In terms of actual number of copies on the market, the very first pressing of The Seven Samurai may total less than SalÚ, or the 120 Days of Sodom, but given that the only change was the removal of a tiny restoration demonstration, I always considered the pursuit of that particular collectible to be the province of the overly fanatical.
Criterion have upgraded their anamorphic 1.85:1 widescreen transfer of SalÚ, or the 120 Days of Sodom to a 1080p, MPEG-4 AVC high-definition picture. The image quality is impressive, showing a nice filmic grain while also eliminating any surface or background noise. Scratches or dirt are non-existent, and though there are a couple of stuttery cuts, this appears to be a source problem and not a transfer problem. Colors are strong, with fine texture shown on skin and, of course, a nauseous clarity when it comes to some of the more foul aspects of the story. Detail is rich and deep, you're going to see more on the Blu-Ray than you bargained for in more ways than one.
The Italian version of the soundtrack has been remixed as an uncompressed monaural audio option. The tones are sharp, and despite being only one channel, there was actually some subtle modulation throughout, with background details given the appropriate volume level in the mix.
In addition to the Italian soundtrack, there is also a version dubbed into English. Given the nature of much Italian cinema--which was often recorded in multiple languages to suit international cast members and almost always dubbed in post anyway--this is not that surprising. Pasolini actually had a French track made himself, and he leaned toward that as the movie's official language. Alas, it is not included here.
Criterion has put the two-disc SalÚ, or the 120 Days of Sodom package onto one Blu-Ray, packaged in a handsome cardboard box with a thick 80-page book featuring credits, chapter listings, photos, and a collection of seven different essays about the movie from filmmakers and critics. It seems to me that it's essential for a film of this nature to acknowledge the debate and give space to a variety of voices to discuss it, so I'm pleased that Criterion has done so both in this written format and on the disc itself. The essays in the booklet actually connect well to the 23-minute Fade to Black featurette that talks to Bernardo Bertolucci, Catherine Breillat, and others about their reaction to the film.
Pasolini himself gets his say in the 33-minute "SalÚ: Yesterday and Today documentary, which actually did serve to make me appreciate his vision more. He had clear intentions for what he wanted to do, even if some of those intentions are lost in the translation between artist and audience. We also get a look at the actual production in the 40-minute The End of "SalÚ," which gathers participants and crew members to discuss the working process and also the aftermath, including Pasolini's murder prior to the movie getting released. Amongst those interviewed are set designer Dante Ferreti, who also returns for a separate 12-minute interview. Also interviewed alone is film scholar and director Jean-Pierre Gorin (28 minutes), an aficionado of Pasolini and an appreciative viewer of SalÚ.
Finally, there is a theatrical trailer included.
Again, these are all the extras from the 2008 DVD edition, though here they are presented in high-definition, 1080i.
When assessing a movie like SalÚ, or the 120 Days of Sodom, standard methods of rating the material seem pointless. For instance, if I had to tell you what I thought of the movie alone, I'd probably lean toward "Rent It" even thought the package itself, just on technical quality and for the content offered, is "Highly Recommended." One's enjoyment (is that possible?) of SalÚ, or the 120 Days of Sodom is such a matter of personal taste, though, it seems fruitless to quibble. It's either for you or it's not, there is no objective distinction to be made. Renting before you buy is probably a good idea just to find out which side of the fence you fall on, but since I do have to choose one ranking, in an effort to be fair and split the difference, I'll say the Blu-Ray edition of SalÚ, or the 120 Days of Sodom from Criterion is put together well enough and of sufficient cinematic interest to be Recommended.
Jamie S. Rich is a novelist and comic book writer. He is best known for his collaborations with JoŽlle Jones, including the hardboiled crime comic book You Have Killed Me, the challenging romance 12 Reasons Why I Love Her, and the 2007 prose novel Have You Seen the Horizon Lately?, for which Jones did the cover. All three were published by Oni Press. His most recent project is the comedy series Spell Checkers, again with Jones and artist Nicolas Hitori de. Follow Rich's blog at Confessions123.com.