Reviewed by Glenn Erickson
Dismissed by the right and deified by the left, Noam Chomsky is indeed a very unpolitical fellow, as
stated in one of the quotes that are peppered through Power and Terror. Refusing to relate
the facts as he sees them with anything but direct bluntness, he shows the virtues and the limits of
opposing official policy with reasoned dissent. A very plain-wrap tour through some major issues
that simply records
parts of his public lectures, Power and Terror doesn't attempt to amplify or corroborate
Chomsky's claims with documentary material, as did
Manufacturing Consent, the previous
Chomsky film treatise.
Noam Chomsky's speaking engagements in the early months of 2002 are sampled. He
presents his view on Terrorism in the post 9.11 world.
Critics unfairly judged Power and Terror for not being cinematic; it's simply a record of
several Noam Chomsky lectures. Chomsky comes off as a college professor should - he's unassuming
and loathe to present himself as a 'charisma package' touting his ideas. He'd rather his words
and ideas speak for themselves. He's not only not a politician (he wants nothing for
stance we find suspicious in America), he's not selling anything except his ideas.
I personally find Chomsky's ideas to be a breath of fresh air in today's oppressive media onslaught; I
think he's a patriot, well knowing that just waving the flag for Noam can be its own trap. There's
a smug leftist comfort of feeling intellectually superior to whatever know-nothing barbarians
are in control of the country at any given moment. I hear some exasperation with Chomsky
because his relentless criticism of the United States of America makes liberals nervous as well.
I don't know if that sentiment stems from his actual
messages, or from the fact that his no-nonsense talk just isn't likely to make much headway in a national
dialogue crowded with hysteria, ignorance and opportunism. Chomsky, happily, doesn't seem to be
affected by the country's emotional doubts and moods.
In his lectures, Chomsky not only applauds our nation but says that the climate for dissent and
intellectual freedom has improved since the 1960s, when it took five years for the anti-Vietnam war
movement to gain momentum. Protest now has a legitimacy that it lacked back then, when police
departments would allow roughnecks to pelt women and children marchers with cans and tomatoes. He
doesn't direct anyone to become an activist, and says as much to an eager attendee who
asks him for guidance - he's a professor simply stating his views, not a politician or a
rabble-rouser. He's also not a satirist or a public jester. His criticism of right wing targets
are sometimes witty, but they are the remarks of a public speaker whose aim is to inform, not inflame.
Power and Terror is not much as a film. The editing is basic, but reasonably effective,
and the text quotes over black that regularly break in seem intrusive. Pieces of the
docu were shot in Chomsky's MIT office, and clearly are cooperative attempts by the filmmaker and the
professor to fill-in missing opinions to round out subjects. It's Chomsky's show all the way, not
a 'rounded' discussion of the issues he raises. 2
Chomsky's messages are never going to find favor with conservatives. He insists upon using historical
facts instead of fairy tales to back up his assertions. His characterization of America as 'insular'
and unconcerned with the rest of the world - ('American think everything of importance happens
here') never goes so far as to
claim that we are villains and the rest of the world are innocent victims. But his accusations
cut deep when he describes current American 'diplomacy' as thinly veiled threats and gangster tactics -
reporting that an Arab delegate was told bluntly by our State Department to keep in line, because
an Operation Desert Storm can be redirected at his country at any time.
Chomsky's analysis of why America will install an oil-friendly regime in Iraq as undemocratic as
Hussein's dictatorship, also makes sound, simple sense. His critics brand him as 'simplistic',
when in actuality he
refuses to be hypocritical. Perhaps politicians who are selling something naturally mistrust college
professors, so-called sheltered academics who can stick to simple facts instead of dealing with
the 'un-simplistic' realities.
Chomsky is very happy to applaud the U.S. as a place where his dissident voice can be heard without
fear of jailing or assassination ... a situation that could change. It could
happen here. 1
First Run Features' DVD of Power and Terror: Noam Chomsky in Our Times is a well-engineered
presentation of a film shot on video. The lighting and audio in the lectures is good, and a
shrewd use of a multi-camera setup pays off in the cramped after-speech moments when the professor
patiently fields questions and signs books.
Chomsky devotees will like the extra lecture clips, which allow him to directly address his
opinions on subjects like Iraq and Globalization. The film was apparently produced in Japan, and
there are some interesting Japanese vocals on the soundtrack. Just for the record, Chomsky's
criticism of the colonial terrorism of the past, does not omit Japan's role in the 1930s and '40s.
On a scale of Excellent, Good, Fair, and Poor,
Power and Terror: Noam Chomsky in Our Times rates:
Supplements: Extra lecture outtakes
Packaging: Amaray case
Reviewed: April 10, 2003
1. I became furious the other day, when a news channel presented a story
about cybercriminal hackers being arrested for breaking into corporate websites, and replacing or
altering main pages with anti-establishment slogans, etc., sort of a web-based harassing graffiti
nuisance. The corporate representative who was proudly hawking a company that roots out these
crooks, coined the word 'Hacktivism', combining Hacker, with Activism. The word is a particularly
venal marketing ploy to associate Activism (which is simply political organizing and information
spreading) with crime. Being 'liberal' already carries the false stigma of wanting to kill babies and
spare mass murderers, hating America and disbelieving in God - this Hacktivism word subtly demonizes the act of
being politically active, and seeks to make expressing an opinion shameful, akin to a crime. Apparently the
only citizen activity acceptable these days is to blindly consume, passively approve, and
2. Viewers looking for a 'rounded' dialogue between Chomsky and
representatives of the status quo are directed to the extras on the
Manufacturing Consent disc, where
the professor is silenced by bullying 'debating' foes who interrupt, insult and heckle him.
DVD Savant Text © Copyright 2003 Glenn Erickson
Go BACK to the Savant Main Page.