The movie
Camille seems like a normal
nine-year-old boy, except perhaps for his habit of videotaping what's going on
around him... and except for the fact that on the day of his birthday, he
suddenly declares that his "real" mother is a different woman, one
who lives across town. Ariane, his mother, alternates between playing along and
trying to reason with him, but he's insistent, behaving exactly as if he really
had awoken among strangers. What's going on?
I like stories with mysterious
elements. I enjoy movies in which there's more to the story than meets the eye;
I loved The Sixth Sense, the film that Comedy of Innocence
(original title: Comédie de l'innocence) is prominently compared to on
the DVD case. But in Comedy of Innocence, the elements just don't fit together
to make an organic, consistent whole. It's all very well for weird things to
happen in the story; in fact, if we're watching a thriller of some kind, we
basically expect strange things to happen, or to learn that people have
something to hide. However, we also expect the characters to behave in at least
moderately rational and comprehensible ways. If the characters behave
inexplicably, if they talk at cross-purposes in every scene... we're set
adrift.
That's exactly what happens in Comedy
of Innocence. The opening situation, in which Camille insists that Ariane
(Isabelle Huppert) isn't his mother, is quite creepy. What doesn't make sense,
though, is how his mother goes along with it. She allows her son to continue
the pretense, even encouraging him in it to the point of going with him to
visit the apartment that he claims is his real "home" and, later,
visiting his claimed "real mother," Isabella (Jeanne Balibar) And
when Isabella plays along, does Ariane object? No, she continues to weirdly play
along, half protesting and half acquiescing to the "relationship."
There's no rational explanation given for her odd behavior or her passivity in
not speaking up to say "I'm his mother, who the heck are you and what kind
of game are you playing with my son?"
Certainly the story requires
that Isabella become entangled in the lives of Camille and his family, but it's
a slap in the viewer's face (and a grave shock to any suspension of disbelief)
to not provide a credible story development to account for it. If Comedy of
Innocence pretends to be a psychological thriller, which it seems to, then it
needs to create characters who are believable, and not merely puppets of the
story.
We might ask the question: Does
Comedy of Innocence tell a ghost story, or does it tell a story about
characters who think they're involved in a ghost story? Either one is a
potentially interesting way to go; unfortunately, Comedy of Innocence muffs
each one. As a creepy thriller, Comedy of Innocence falls short by being
at the same time too obvious and too obscure. The soundtrack is extremely
manipulative (to the point that I started wondering if the film was engaging in
self-parody), with dramatic "creepy moment" cues liberally plastered
throughout the film, constantly reminding us that we're supposed to find the
goings-on disturbing in some way. Yet as I've mentioned before, the characters
constantly talk at cross-purposes: the dialogue goes nowhere, explains nothing,
and instead of developing the plot, only serves to create more confusion about
what the movie is about. So much for Comedy of Innocence as a thriller.
As a psychological exploration of its characters, it's even less effective: if
the characters' behavior makes no logical sense, and their dialogue reveals
nothing meaningful, how are we to come to any greater understanding of them?
What about the ending? Does it
bring the pieces together to form an interesting picture at the last minute?
Sadly, no. The conclusion does resolve the question of "Is there something
supernatural going on, or not?" but that's about it. It's neither
psychologically convincing nor dramatically interesting; in fact, it's the kind
of ending that makes you say "Why did I waste an hour and a half of my
free time just to lead up to this?"
The only real bright spot in
this murky film is young Nils Hugon's respectable performance as Camille; he's
quite believable, and the few genuinely effective moments of the film are ones
in which he's the center of attention, making us wonder whether he's a manipulative
monster-child, a confused little boy, or something in between.
The DVD
Video
Comedy of Innocence is
presented in a respectable anamorphic widescreen transfer, at its original
1.85:1 aspect ratio. The print is clean and the image as a whole is free of noise,
with a generally fresh look to it; colors and contrast are natural-looking and
generally pleasing to the eye. Edge enhancement is present, varying from mild
to heavy depending on the scene, and the image as a whole has a soft appearance
to it, but overall it's a solid transfer.
The English subtitles are
optional, which is very good, but unfortunately for viewers who want to see
them, they're badly placed and rather obtrusive. The words are in bright yellow
and placed fairly high up on the screen, rather than right at the bottom of the
image; the result is that in many scenes, the characters' faces are
considerably obscured by the subtitles.
Audio
The French Dolby 5.1 track is
reasonably good, providing good use of the surround channels for the music and
the occasional sound effect. I found the dialogue to be occasionally slightly
muffled-sounding, especially if the characters weren't front-and-center in the
scene, but for the most part it sounds fine, and as a whole, the track is clean
and natural-sounding.
Extras
Of most note is a 13-minute
interview with Raoul Ruiz, the director of Comedy of Innocence, which
focuses on the themes of the film; it will be of interest to those who
appreciated the movie. Other minor bonus features are a trailer, a set of filmographies,
and weblinks.
Final thoughts
Placing atmosphere above
coherence, Comedy of Innocence concocts an odd patchwork of a film. If
it were disassembled into its different parts and re-assembled with a better
script, one that provided some sort of coherent narrative and plausible
character motivations, Comedy of Innocence could very well be an
intriguing film. However, what we actually end up with is a story that just
feels pretentious and self-absorbed, never bothering to provide a narrative or
characters that will draw the viewer in. While it's a rental candidate for
those who are looking for mood rather than story, as a general recommendation
I'll suggest just skipping it.