|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orson Welles shows how to fake it ![]()
The Movie To make F for Fake, French director François Reichenbach's documentary footage of famed art forger Elmyr de Hory was re-edited by Welles, a master in the cutting room, and combined with an array of footage he shot (along with a few other sources) to create something of a public personal conversation about hoaxes, fakes and deception, with a man well versed in those arts. At the time of Welles' production, the author of a book on de Hory's forgeries, Clifford Irving, was exposed for faking an autobiography on Howard Hughes. Throwing in his own history as a charlatan, Welles had the perfect three legs for the film to stand on. With these three stories, Welles' constructs layers of lies while revealing a great many truths. A self-confessed bender of the truth, he's a faker, telling the story of a faker, who told the story of a faker. There are rules about double negatives, but how about triple? Does that negate everything? Not at all, as by delving into the falsehoods, the basest of human realities are put under Welles' microscope and revealed in the truest of lights. ![]() The look of the film is unique and extremely creative, playing with the concepts of film, video and television, pulling whatever Welles' needed from each medium; anything that made the way his story was told better. The ideas of truth and fiction are also toyed with, preventing the audience from feeling entirely comfortable with any fact presented to them. In many ways, that's the key to the story and its assault on experts and whether their presence dictates the existence of fakes, or vice versa. As much as the visuals and techniques are important to the film, it's the subtleties that are most impressive. Consider, Welles' swears to the viewer that he's telling the truth...while dressed as a magician. Verbal slight of hand, perhaps? There's also the matter of the word play that goes on throughout the film, supported by small visual clues that go by the eye without registering on a conscious level. Watch every word you see--a rule for life, as well as this movie. Though the film is easily the work of a genius and is informed with a sense of fun and energy, this is not a movie everyone will enjoy. In truth, it's almost like a prank being pulled on the viewing audience, who are at Welles' mercy for the length of the film, as they are likely to approach the material the way they would approach any documentary, only to learn it is unlike any documentary. If you can ally your way of thinking with Welles', you will have a much better time with this film.
The DVDs
The audio is presented in mono, and comes from the center speaker in your surround sound system. The dialogue is reproduced without distortion and the mix is very good, while the sound is bold.
The Extras Next up is a feature-length audio commentary with Welles collaborator Oja Kodar and F for Fake cinematographer Gary Graver. The track is edited together to include the separately recorded participants, leaving just bits of dead air, while covering several areas of interest related to the movie, including production stories and reflections on the themes in the film. Kodar's Croatian accent is hard to grasp at first, but it becomes easier to understand as the track progresses. Both commentators bring a lot of information and thought to the recording, and their level of connection to the film is evident in the commentary's energy. A nine-minute trailer for the film is also on Disc One, which stands as both proof of Welles' genius and his complete lack of understanding of the commercial aspects of film. This trailer is unwieldy in every way, and wasn't seen in theaters, but in loaded with the same convention-flouting skill seen in the feature. The footage is in very bad shape, but the concept is unique and creative. Disc Two opens with the 1995 feature-length documentary, Orson Welles: One-Man Band. Focusing on the director's later years, an era dominated by false starts and bad luck, the film is a look at what a more studio-friendly Welles could have completed, but which instead sits stillborn of the master's mind, including the completed, but unreleased The Other Side of the Wind. The scope of material covered is impressive, showing in good detail one of the more fascinating aspects of his career, that being his willingness to do just about anything for a dollar, in order to finance his more artistic endeavors. For the Welles completist, this is an absolute necessity, and should intrigue any lover of the cinema, especially with the rare look at Welles' sense of humor. 1997's Almost True: The Noble Art of Forgery, a 52-minute documentary on de Hory , approaches the topic in a much more straight-forward style than F for Fake. In comparison to Welles' work, it's very dry, coming across as something you might see on PBS one Sunday afternoon. Despite that, it's a very good companion piece to the film, as it explains de Hory in more detail and truthfulness. A profile on Clifford Irving, done as a Classic Update on "60 Minutes 2" brings the info on the faker up to date, at least as of 2000. Starting with clips of Irving's first appearance on the show in 1972, the almost nine-minute segment with the 70-year-old man gives him a chance to come clean on his lies and gives more understanding to what is seen in Welles' movie. The final extra on the DVD might be the most interesting, as it holds the audio answers to reporters' questions from famous recluse Howard Hughes, as presented over the phone in the original press conference. Presented as a series of text screens, the questions are written, and Hughes' responses are heard after pressing the play option. There are 14 clips in all, covering the book and his reclusive life, including the rumors about his physical appearance. The quality of the audio is very impressive. Included with the discs is a 16-page booklet, with an essay about F for Fake by film critic Jonathan Rosenbaum, along with info on the DVD materials and credits. The essay, written by someone who knew Welles, puts the film into the context of Welles' filmography, as well as that of the documentary genre, while the booklet is well-designed and classy. ![]()
The Bottom Line |