|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Michael Wood is his own worst
enemy. His 1998 BBC documentary, In the Footsteps of Alexander
the Great displays the best aspects of the English approach to historical
investigation: tenacity, insight, a deep level of commitment to subject
matter, and a sweeping perspective that allows information to fall into
place while maintaining a broader context. Shot across the globe
in adventuresome locales and brimming with regional color, In the
Footsteps of Alexander the Great
is a remarkable and entertaining documentary mini-series with one self-defeating
drawback: its presenter. Aiming for an infectious enthusiasm that
no doubt has its origins in genuine feeling, Wood nonetheless overshoots
the mark, coming off as a hyperactive poseur whose desire to excite
is consistently undercut by his dorky attempts at bravado and a predilection
for overstated dramatic gestures. Not content to rely on the truly
engaging material in his hands, Wood thrusts it in our faces with the
thuggish insistence of an overeager showman. Had he relied more
confidently on the material itself, and avoided the added "personality,"
the result would have been much more enjoyable. Wood's project here - and
it is an impressive one - is to physically retrace the route of Alexander
the Great's ongoing campaign to conquer the known world, a journey
that originally took place more than two millennia ago. Wood's
camera crew ably captures the visual splendor of these locales, which
range from Greece to Afghanistan, and from the Mediterranean Sea to
the mountains of the Himalayas. It's certainly a picturesque
journey, and Wood's narrative approach is to juxtapose what Alexander
experienced and achieved with the modern ways of the peoples he conquered
so long ago. In many cases, Alexander's legacy is alive and
visible among the cultures he swept through, especially in parts of
the Middle East, a reminder that some places on Earth remain largely
untouched by the engines of progress - a true anthropological marvel
that was once the dream of imperial Britain, a power that yearned to
conquer and "enlighten" such people (see Victorian-era English literature,
from Haggard to Kipling.) Wood's more empathic and curious attitude
is in no way reminiscent of his own cultural ancestors', except in
his desire to document what fascinates him. And fascinating this documentary
is, as it covers a vast conceptual landscape that embraces geography,
anthropology, archaeology, and history. When Wood is on-camera,
however, the proceedings falter. The writer-presenter's energy
is forced, unnecessary, and distracting. Fortunately, he does
not hog the camera, and the exotic locations are often allowed to visually
speak for themselves; fortunately, Wood's off-camera narration does
not suffer from the same overbearing quality as his on-camera persona,
and his input in this context is extremely informative. The DVD Image Sound Bonus Content Final
Thoughts Luckily enough for them, most people are less easily irritated than I am, and hopefully Michael Wood's hyperactive and self-aware antics won't detract from their enjoyment of his otherwise fine documentary. An incisive historical journey, In the Footsteps of Alexander the Great is well worth seeing in any case. Recommended. |