|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The biggest fault with the entire series has been
the entire
lack of good acting and good story. Both elements are crucial to making
a well
made film series but are apparently entirely unimportant with
rule-sheet following
for "A Guide to Making a Box Office Megahit Series". It's a good book,
in
theory. Too bad I have higher expectations from multi-film series than
storylines that feel as though they can legitimately be summed up in a
few
sentences. Who will Bella choose - Edward
or Jacob? That might insult twihards but it seems a fair way to
describe
the entire series. Not a whole lot
ever seems to be happening in these frequently dull cinematic
experiences that
seem more appropriate for television. Then there's the acting. Kristin
Stewart
is a notable actress who typically delivers strong performances and yet
she
usually seems somewhat disinterested in her role as Bella Swan. Then
there are
these male leads, performed by Robert Pattinson and Taylor Lautner, who
have both
been in need of some serious acting lessons for years.
It is surprising then that the latest Twilight film seems to be taking itself far less seriously than any of the predecessors did. I chalk up most of this pleasing difference to the new director, Bill Condon, whom I am a considerable fan of (Condon directed a personal favorite with the award-winning Gods and Monsters). Condon even seems to have spent considerable time developing the acting skills of the three lead actors as their performances are (shockingly) not nearly as terrible this go around. Kristin Stewart seems more believable as Bella than in any of the other films and manages to pull off the sensation of being a newly-wed, the horror of a strange fantasy pregnancy, and the confusion of all of the proceedings. Both Taylor Lautner and Robert Pattinson have a couple scenes where I would describe the performances as having actual nuance, something I never previously imagined myself writing about either actor in the series. None of the performances are leaps and bounds better, but it seems fair to say that actual improvement has been displayed. I was impressed by the attempts made to bring something extra to these characters. The framing of several sequences is downright
artistic and
even in the best of ways. The story might be just as simplistic and
underdeveloped
as before, but the presentation of said story has improved with a sense
of
cinematic wonder that hasn't been on display in any of the previous
entries.
Each entry in the Twilight Saga has been at a TV-quality level despite
the
filmmakers having significantly larger budgets that should have
prevented the
entirely-episodic storytelling from actually replicating the episodic
TV
feeling. These films should have always felt like genuine cinema
through their
production aspects, but sadly that hasn't been the case until now. Bill
Condon
has a gifted, graceful, and beautiful eye for the visuals of cinema
even when
working with merely average storyline material. His
contributions have been so worthwhile that
I almost wish he had been in charge of directing the entire series.
There are other elements that actually impressed as well. The cinematography by frequent Guillermo Del Toro (Pan's Labyrinth, Hellboy) collaborator Guillermo Navarro is stunning. I wouldn't hesitate at calling Breaking Dawn: Part 1 one of the finest examples of great cinematography of this entire year. That might be the biggest surprise of the entire production. Then there's the score by Carter Burwell, which is even better than his score to the first Twilight film. Other gifted composers have contributed music towards this series (Alexandre Desplat, Howard Shore) but while Desplat crafted a solid score it wasn't one of my favorites from the composer and Shore seemed to be phoning it in a bit with Eclipse. Carter Burwell made the largest contributions to the series, and his return to the franchise is merited and appreciated. It's not worth the time to delve too deeply into
the story.
It meanders about frequently and is slow-paced without warrant to some
large degree.
The relationship between Bella and Edward takes an awkward turn that
disturbs
as Bella wakes from their honeymoon with bruises. What in
the world? Something tells me the intent wasn't to
raise questions of domestic
violence but I couldn't help but cringe
when Bella essentially shrugs it off. Other moments in the film seem
unintentionally funny: a perfect example being when Jacob enters upon a
fondling Bella and Edward and he simply stares at them for a few
perfectly awkward
cringe-worthy moments. Or how about when Bella drinks vampire blood to
help
with her uncomfortable pregnancy? It was humorously gross the first
time, but
then she goes back for seconds and thirds. OK, on second thought, maybe
that
part was intentionally hilarious.
In the end, I was quite surprised to find myself enjoying the overall effort. The direction was solid, the acting improved, the cinematography brilliant, and the score graceful. The film was interesting even despite a story and characters that are never as developed as the massive box office would seem to suggest. I doubt I will ever consider myself a Twilight fan but I'm actually starting to think taking the entire trip of viewing the series hasn't been entirely with fault. Plus Anna Kendrick is in it doing her entirely cutesy and funny thing (and that is always a positive). The whole of the Twilight Saga isn't brilliant or even particularly entertaining, but with Breaking Dawn: Part 1 it is at least a well made experience worthy of a matinee trip to the theater. That's gotta count for something. |