|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
answer to the reboot/remake question (as far
as I can see it) is that Director Marc
Webb (500 Days of Summer) has brought viewers
his own take on Spider-Man. Webb brings his own
personality to the
table even while crafting a film which wants to respect the
Sam Raimi directed efforts that preceded this production. The
Amazing Spider-Man
is surprisingly capable of creating its own footprints in the sands of
time. The
film has story elements that
anyone who has seen the original film series will be entirely familiar
with. I'm not
willing
to disagree about the suggestion that this is a movie that follows some
similar patterns to the previous Spider-Man, because this film
absolutely
does follow some of the same storyline aspects, and this is something
that seems unsurprising given the "reboot"
nature
of the project. Considering the fact that many of these elements are
inherent to
the comics, it even makes it seem harsh to simply write it off as a
total
remake. Marc Webb crafts his own web
with this project and has enough
vision to make these proceedings seem new and interesting despite
familiar territory.
Sure, some of the action scenes are a bit too choppy
and the CGI (as impressive as it is) was sometimes a distraction,
but the direction worked where it matters most: in making us care about
these characters first. Witht the screenplay and with the
direction, I had the feeling that I was on a journey in storytelling
that is so often forgoten in summer movies. On a
note of personal interest: The Amazing Spider-Man
contains both
lighthearted moments and comedic elements mixed in with all the
extended seriousness that was expected from fans. Viewers and critics
who are suggesting that the entire movie is a
drab dark
experience and that it doesn't grab onto the original aspect of more
joyous
Spider-Man territory have been a bit misleading in their claims about
the films
overall stylistic approach to storytelling. In life you sometimes have
to remember to highlight both the darkness and the lightness in our
world experiences, and in our personal experiences too. The Amazing Spider-Man handles that
concept well. There is never total bleakness or total happiness 24/7
and around the clock. We have moments of pure drama and lighthearted
humor in this film. It finds a good balance. ![]() ![]() Some
notes on the previous Spider-Man films feel necessary to properly
explain my reaction to this film. Here are some of my thoughts on the
matter:
I am a huge fan of the original Spider-Man trilogy directed by the quirky and offbeat Sam Raimi. Raimi is the kind of wonder-kid director who makes you want to step back and simply "marvel" (as per the course, a pun is intended) in the beauty of his unique perspective and stylistic inclinations. You go where Raimi is going; because you know he has the imagination and skill to take you swinging, just like Spider-Man himself does. I
read countless comic books throughout
my youth, but I was never the biggest follower of the Spider-Man
comic
books. The comics didn't appeal to me as much as my main-readings from
Captain
American and Batman. Yet from the Spider-Man comics I did read, I
thought that
Raimi perfectly handled the source material (at least given some basic
understanding
of the comics) and that he brought to cinematic life the inherent joy
and wonder
of the storytelling universe while delivering moving dramatics and
impressive
visuals with uncommon skill. I'm
confident that I've watched
those Sam Raimi directed Spider-Man
films with an incredible fancy for them that goes beyond my normal love
for
cinema. In a way, these films became part of a small core group of
movies that
I would define as being amongst my favorite movies ever,
and nothing will take that love for pure cinematic wonderment
away from me. Those films are masterful comic book movies. Sure, I
won't
disagree that the third one was the weakest in the series, but even Spider-Man 3 was far better than your
average multiplex fare. I know some harp that comic book movies still
can't be great but the Spider-Man films
were massive stepping stones in the wave of excellent adaptations we
continue to see in cinemas todays. I
wasn't even sure if I wanted to see The
Amazing Spider-Man because of how much I love the Sam Raimi
trilogy.
I was so irritated and frustrated with Sony
deciding to reboot this franchise and go ahead with casting new actors,
hiring a
new director, and everything else this process would entail. I wanted
to see Spider-Man 4, and with everyone who made
that original trilogy y
involved. I'd even be thrilled if Sony announced a Spider-Man
4 tomorrow... or the next day. Or even a few years from
now... but nonetheless I was surprised by how much I ended up enjoying The Amazing Spider-Man.
The
best reason to see The Amazing Spider-Man is that it
is a
well-told movie with downright great performances from Andrew Garfield
as Peter
Parker and Emma Stone as Gwen Stacy. I was able to put-aside my fond
feelings
for Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst and accept the differences between
the performances -- these are different actors, after all, and in the
case of Gwen Stacy we are talking about a different character
altogether with this new adaptation.
The
chemistry between the pair was also stellar and this contributed to a
lot of
the emotional weight of the film. At its core, The Amazing Spider-Man is a film
about people, our relationships, and defining who we are and how we are
in relation to the loved ones around us.
Supporting actor Rhys Ifans also provides an impressive performance as the conflicted and distraught scientist turned monster and his performance is right up there with the best of the performances in the earlier films. The human moments with this character elevated many scenes and grounded this story in a tragic and realistic way. Denis Leary was also fantastic as Captain Stacy, Gwen's father and a hero who is only just beginning to learn about Spider-Man and to form an opinion over the course of the story. Again, the human component is the element that makes the film work as well as it does and it is why I found the experience so compelling. The
bottom line: I walked into the
screening of The Amazing Spider-Man
with incredibly muted expectations, and without much anticipation. I
walked out
feeling as though the film was actually amazing. The
Amazing
Spider-Man shattered my expectations, and in the best
way possible. Instead of being disappointed, I
was thrilled. I wasn't expecting that at all and I was floored by my
own
reaction to the film. This movie was two hours and sixteen minutes of "a-m-a-z-i-n-g" fun. Marc
Webb may
still be new to the filmmaking
world but he certainly seems to be up to the task in a way that will
resonate
with audiences. In reaching the end-credits, I heard bountiful applause
from
the audience at my screening and the sound was so joyous that I really
appreciated hearing it - something about this film was clicking with
audiences the right way and I was completely on board with them as a
fellow fan. This
is one of the best pictures of
the year. It doesn't take away my mad-love for Sam Raimi's Spider-Man
movies and it doesn't detract from my enjoyment of those
films either. In fact, I could see myself wanting to revisit The Amazing Spider-Man many times. Sign
me up for a sequel too and we can begin to see where this alternate
timeline of
the story might take us. You might think that what I am about to say is
crazy-talk, but I think this is arguably an even greater comic book
film than The Avengers is. I
certainly expect that to mean something to some of you. I think it
means that I feel as though this is a film you should head to the
cinema to see and critique for yourself. You may just find yourself
walking away amazed. Or even swingin'.
Highly
Recommended.
See it in 2D (and remember to stay for the first few minutes of the credits as there is a brief bonus scene). |