<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII" ?> 
  <rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:review="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/">
    <channel>
      <title>Olie Coen's DVD Talk DVD Reviews</title> 
      <link>http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/list.php?reviewType=DVD+Video</link> 
      <description>DVD Talk DVD Review RSS Feed</description> 
      <language>en-us</language> 
      <item>
         <title>Star Trek Into Darkness</title>
         <category>Theatrical</category>
         <link>http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=61137</link>
         <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:42:15 PDT</pubDate>
         <description>
           <![CDATA[
              <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Highly Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=61137"><img src="http://images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1368569564.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1369237170_1.jpg" width="400" height="237"></center><br><br><b>Director: J.J. Abrams</b><br><b>Starring: Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana</b><br><b>Year: 2013</b><p align="justify">When <i>Star Trek</i> first came out in 2009 I didn't think I would like it.  As a fan of the original films, I was a little put off by a the young cast of Hollywood newcomers attempting to represent the characters I had come to love.  I mean, come on, Harold as Sulu?  I wasn't buying it and I wasn't planning on watching it.  But I ended up seeing it, and sometimes it's nice when you're completely wrong.  It was much more of an homage than a ripoff, a origin story rather than a remake, and it actually came across as more than an attempt to make money.  I mean, it made money, but you could tell by watching it that these actors and Abrams all liked Star...<a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=61137">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>
              ]]>         </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Great Gatsby</title>
         <category>Theatrical</category>
         <link>http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=61120</link>
         <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 09:20:31 PDT</pubDate>
         <description>
           <![CDATA[
              <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Rent It</b>
               <p><a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=61120"><img src="http://images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1368212273.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1368633782_2.jpg" width="400" height="196"></center><br><br><b>Director: Baz Luhrmann</b><br><b>Starring: Leonardo DiCaprio, Tobey Maguire, Carey Mulligan</b><br><b>Year: 2013</b><p align="justify">I was very surprised when <i>The Great Gatsby</i> got such terrible reviews.  It had just been out for a couple days and already it was getting slammed by audiences and critics alike.  I just couldn't believe it; wasn't this the same film who's trailer had me and everyone I knew wanting to rush to the theatre that day?  What could be so awful that it would get such bad critique across the board?  I assumed it wasn't Baz Luhrmann's style, because people would be expecting that.  After all, if you've seen <i>Romeo + Juliet, Moulin Rouge!</i>, or <i>Australia</i> you know what to expect from his movies; larger than life characters &amp; costume...<a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=61120">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>
              ]]>         </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Stand Off</title>
         <category>DVD Video</category>
         <link>http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=61116</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 06:46:11 PDT</pubDate>
         <description>
           <![CDATA[
              <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Rent It</b>
               <p><a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=61116"><img src="http://images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B00AKIPALG.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1368534785_5.jpg" width="400" height="266"></center><br><br><b>Director: Terry George</b><br><b>Starring: Brendan Fraser, Colm Meaney, Martin McCann</b><br><b>Year: 2011</b><p align="justify">I'm a strong believer that there is a difference between a "film" and a "movie".  A film is artistic, it's a statement, it relies heavily on great acting and great directing.  A film has deeper meaning than what you see on screen, and it's tailor made to be discussed and picked apart.  A movie is entertaining, it's a fun time, it relies on mostly action, either comedic or intense.  A movie can be taken at face value, and the less you critique it the more enjoyable it is.  Now, some actors can switch back and forth between films and movies with little effort; Tom Hanks, for example, can move from funny to dramatic, heavy to lighthearted.  Others se...<a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=61116">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>
              ]]>         </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Oasis of the Zombies: Remastered Edition</title>
         <category>DVD Video</category>
         <link>http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=59779</link>
         <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 07:34:00 PDT</pubDate>
         <description>
           <![CDATA[
              <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Rent It</b>
               <p><a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=59779"><img src="http://images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B00AIANJ9Q.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1368105844_3.jpg" width="400" height="225"></center><br><br><b>Director: Jesus Franco</b><br><b>Starring: Manuel Gelin, Antonio Mayans</b><br><b>Year: 1982</b><p align="justify">If you're interested in 80s zombie movies, do yourself a favor and check out my review of <a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read_better.php?___f=preview&amp;ID=59778&amp;___r=%2Freviews%2Flogin%2Freviews.php%3FrecordState%3DApproved"><i>Zombie Lake</i></a>.  It's a staple of the genre, and is worth a watch if that's your thing.  Also, reading about/seeing that will set the table for this, my review of the very similar <i>Oasis of the Zombies</i>.  Also known as <i>The Treasure of the Living Dead</i>, it has a lot of connections to Jean Rollin's 1981 horror click, as both were written by Jesus Franco, the Spanish actor, director, writer, producer, you name...<a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=59779">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>
              ]]>         </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Family Weekend</title>
         <category>DVD Video</category>
         <link>http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60773</link>
         <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 09:26:06 PDT</pubDate>
         <description>
           <![CDATA[
              <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Skip It</b>
               <p><a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60773"><img src="http://images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B00B58FUAG.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1367421247_2.jpg" width="400" height="170"></center><br><br><b>Director: Benjamin Epps</b><br><b>Starring: Kristin Chenoweth, Matthew Modine, Olesya Rulin</b><br><b>Year: 2013</b><p align="justify">This movie had disaster written all over it from the beginning.  When I first saw the trailer I thought it was a joke.  I couldn't imagine that someone actually thought that it would be a good idea to produce this film.  But then I got to thinking, as I sometimes do.  Maybe I was the one who was stupid for not seeing the genius behind this project.  I mean, it must have cost about five dollars to make; it's set in a house and at a local high school, the only star who's popularity would demand any money is Chenoweth, and the director did his own producing &amp;amp; editing.  And you know it's going to make <i>some</i> money; Chenoweth herself...<a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60773">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>
              ]]>         </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The Scarlet Pimpernel</title>
         <category>DVD Video</category>
         <link>http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60130</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 03:54:03 PDT</pubDate>
         <description>
           <![CDATA[
              <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60130"><img src="http://images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B00BC0JGUW.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1366650158_3.jpg" width="400" height="287"></center><br><br><b>Director: Clive Donner</b><br><b>Starring: Jane Seymour, Anthony Andrews, Ian McKellen</b><br><b>Year: 1982</b><p align="justify">This was one of those movies that could only exceed expectations, but only because expectations were decidedly low.  CBS produced this version of the classic Baroness Orczy novel in 1982, casting Seymour (<i>Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman</i>), Andrews (<i>The King's Speech</i>), and McKellan (<i>The Lord of the Rings</i>).  However, <i>The Scarlet Pimpernel</i> was aired long before these actors became known for these projects.  So, what we have is a made-for-TV movie about a swashbuckling fop starring relative unknowns broadcast on network TV in the 80s.  Sounds like a recipe for disaster.  But looks can be deceiving, and that, as the saying goes, i...<a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60130">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>
              ]]>         </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Out in the Open</title>
         <category>DVD Video</category>
         <link>http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60747</link>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:52:09 PDT</pubDate>
         <description>
           <![CDATA[
              <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60747"><img src="http://images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B00AI12MK2.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1366399353_1.jpg" width="400" height="235"></center><br><br><b>Director: Matthew Smith</b><br><b>Starring: Matthew Smith, Solly Hemus, Carson Kressley</b><br><b>Year: 2013</b><p align="justify">If you want to see a documentary about a relevant and intriguing topic, you would be hard pressed to find one more fitting than <i>Out in the Open</i>.  The issues of gay rights and marriage equality are on the table right now in our country, and in ten years laws, cultures, and mindsets may be completely different than they are today.  It's exciting to be alive in a time of change, whichever side you may be on, and that fervor comes through very clearly in this film.  But putting equal rights aside, there are other issues confronting homosexual culture, and they may be the most important of all; AIDS, suicide, acceptance, bullying.  A documenta...<a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60747">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>
              ]]>         </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Knuckleball!</title>
         <category>DVD Video</category>
         <link>http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60176</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 14:12:51 PDT</pubDate>
         <description>
           <![CDATA[
              <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Rent It</b>
               <p><a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60176"><img src="http://images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B00B0LKVN4.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1366141485_1.jpg" width="400" height="225"></center><br><br><b>Director: Ricki Stern, Anne Sundberg</b><br><b>Starring: Tim Wakefield, R.A. Dickey</b><br><b>Year: 2012</b><br><br>First off, what is a knuckleball?  Spellcheck won't let it slide, but it is an actual thing.  It's a baseball pitch, and ironically it has nothing to do with the knuckles anymore.  Most baseballs are thrown by gripping the ball on the seams in various ways with various fingers.  The knuckleball, however, uses the fingertips.  When it was first created, a pitcher would grip the ball with his knuckles, hence the name, but now pitchers only use there fingertips and thumb to hold the ball before throwing.  This manner of pitching the ball creates zero spin, allowing the ball to float through the air at a very low speed.  Sounds easy to hit, but the secret of the k...<a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60176">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>
              ]]>         </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Zombie Lake: Remastered Edition</title>
         <category>DVD Video</category>
         <link>http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=59778</link>
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:14:43 PDT</pubDate>
         <description>
           <![CDATA[
              <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=59778"><img src="http://images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B00AIANJ3M.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1365631090_2.jpg" width="400" height="231"></center><br><br><b>Director: Jean Rollin</b><br><b>Starring: Howard Vernon, Pierre-Marie Escourrou</b><br><b>Year: 1981</b><br><br>I have a weak spot for zombie movies.  The whole idea is utterly ridiculous, yet somehow believable.  And that's why there are so many books, TV shows, and movies based on zombies; because people love to laugh at them but can't stop thinking that it just might be possible.  Now, the premise of <i>Zombie Lake</i> might seem grossly unfathomable when compared to other films in it's genre, like <i>World War Z</i>.  But it doesn't really matter, because it has everything you could ever want from a zombie movie and more; hideous walking dead, frightened townspeople, devilish secrets, nakedly gallivanting women, guns, neck-biting, hands creepily poking out of swampy wat...<a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=59778">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>
              ]]>         </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Gun Hill Road</title>
         <category>DVD Video</category>
         <link>http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60062</link>
         <pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 13:07:13 PDT</pubDate>
         <description>
           <![CDATA[
              <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Highly Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60062"><img src="http://images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B00ANGIC4W.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1364564517_1.jpg" width="400" height="200"></center><br><br><b>Director: Rashaad Ernesto Green</b><br><b>Starring: Esai Morales, Harmony Santana, Judy Reyes</b><br><b>Year: 2011</b><br><br>I've lived a fairly easy life.  I mean, everyone has problems, but mine were never huge.  I grew up in small town America, we were never rich but always made due, my family was loving, and I've always liked myself and have known who I am.  So, sometimes I feel as if I have a difficult time either connecting to or understanding the problems that characters face in various gritty movies.  I can't fully appreciate the struggles of minorities in inner cities, the problems that broken families face, or how hard it can be for some people to "find themselves".  So as I prepared to watch <i>Gun Hill Road</i>, I assumed that there might be a disconnect betwee...<a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60062">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>
              ]]>         </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>After Fall, Winter</title>
         <category>DVD Video</category>
         <link>http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=59028</link>
         <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 03:29:54 PDT</pubDate>
         <description>
           <![CDATA[
              <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Skip It</b>
               <p><a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=59028"><img src="http://images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B009NI2XVE.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1364240287_1.jpg" width="400" height="200"></center><br><br><b>Director: Eric Schaeffer</b><br><b>Starring: Eric Schaeffer, Lizzie Brochere</b><br><b>Year: 2011</b><br><br>I'm always wary when I come across a movie that is written, directed, produced, and starring the same person.  I mean, how can you have time and energy enough to put that much of yourself into a film?  And giving all of that, how can you have anything left in the tank to edit, censor, critique, judge, or just enjoy?  It's just not a great idea to make one film the definition of your life; it's almost guaranteed to fall short of its expectations.  And such is the case with <i>After Fall, Winter</i>, which, furthermore, is a sequel to the equally self-indulgent film <i>Fall</i>.  It's obvious that Schaffer put his all into this movie, and he deserves some applause for ...<a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=59028">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>
              ]]>         </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bath Salt Zombies</title>
         <category>DVD Video</category>
         <link>http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60031</link>
         <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:51:20 PDT</pubDate>
         <description>
           <![CDATA[
              <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Rent It</b>
               <p><a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60031"><img src="http://images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B00A3TFI5U.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1363633552_5.jpg" width="297" height="170"></center><br><br><b>Director: Dustin Mills</b><br><b>Starring: Brandon Salkil, Josh Eal, Ethan Holey</b><br><b>Year: 2013</b><br><br>As far as I knew, bath salts were something I bought for my mom for Christmas.  They smell nice, they look like rock candy, and they are a cheap &amp; easy present.  I heard about "bath salts" about a month ago from a friend who works on a college campus.  Apparently this new drug is making the rounds and is causing quite a stir.  It is a substituted cathinone, with effects similar to amphetamine or cocaine.  The interesting thing about "bath salts" is that they are small white crystals, look like epsom salts, and are often packaged and labeled "not for human consumption", which inhibits their legal prosecution.  Anyway, as Joe Friday would say, those are "just t...<a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60031">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>
              ]]>         </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Once</title>
         <category>DVD Video</category>
         <link>http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60012</link>
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:57:53 PDT</pubDate>
         <description>
           <![CDATA[
              <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Highly Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60012"><img src="http://images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1363046046.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1363054595_1.jpg" width="323" height="156"></center><br><br><b>Director: John Carney</b><br><b>Starring: Glen Hansard, Marketa Irglova</b><br><br>Once in a while a film has an effect on you.  It happens.  No one is immune.  Something about a particular film gets to you in a particular way.  Maybe you can't explain it, maybe you don't understand it, but you feel it, and that's enough.  Once in a <i>great</i> while one film has that effect on millions of people all at the same time.  That's when you know something special has happened; when so many people, critics, audiences, everyone, feel changed by a film.  <i>Once</i> is that movie.  It is that feeling.  And it's undefinable.  But isn't that what makes it wonderful?<br><br><b>The Movie</b><br><br><br><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1363030991_2.jpg...<a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60012">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>
              ]]>         </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Lincoln</title>
         <category>Theatrical</category>
         <link>http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60008</link>
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 04:21:59 PDT</pubDate>
         <description>
           <![CDATA[
              <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Rent It</b>
               <p><a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60008"><img src="http://images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1352423684.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1362964813_1.jpg" width="318" height="159"></center><br><br><b>Director: Steven Spielberg</b><br><b>Starring: Daniel Day-Lewis, Sally Field, Tommy Lee Jones</b><br><b>Year: 2012</b><br><br>I was a little late in seeing what many said was the film of the year and, before even seeing it, I was ready to believe them.  I mean, come on; Spielberg directing, Day-Lewis starring, and John Williams producing the music.  Add in the epic story of one of American history's most influential figures and how could it go wrong?  Well, for good or bad I got to see things go wrong before I got to see the movie; losing Best Director to Ang Lee and then losing Best Picture to <a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/58436/argo/"><i>Argo</i></a>.  Apparently <i>Lincoln</i> wasn't the unbeatable cinematic giant it appeared to be when it first hit theatres, a...<a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=60008">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>
              ]]>         </description>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>28 Hotel Rooms</title>
         <category>DVD Video</category>
         <link>http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=58972</link>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 17:38:35 PDT</pubDate>
         <description>
           <![CDATA[
              <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=58972"><img src="http://images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B00A7WHL08.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1362945524_1.jpg" width="341" height="148"></center><br/><b>Director: Matt Roth</b><br/><b>Starring: Chris Messina, Marin Ireland</b><br/><br/>It starts with sex.  And while, yes, it then follows up with more sex, that's not what it's about.  The beginning of a film can be both deceptive and revealing, and the beginning of <i>28 Hotel Rooms</i> is no different.  When the first scene of a movie opens and the title appears, we start to form opinions and expectations; we do this with every movie we watch.  But they can change, these ideas, they are forced to change as the movie itself changes.  And that is why we keep watching; to see if our assumptions pan out or if we get to be surprised.<br/><br/><b>The Movie</b><br><br/><br/><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1362945524_2.jpg" width="300" height="168">...<a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=58972">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>
              ]]>         </description>
      </item>
    </channel>
  </rss>