Reviews & Columns
Reviews
DVD
TV on DVD
Blu-ray
4K UHD
International DVDs
In Theaters
Reviews by Studio
Video Games

Features
Collector Series DVDs
Easter Egg Database
Interviews
DVD Talk Radio
Feature Articles

Columns
Anime Talk
DVD Savant
Horror DVDs
The M.O.D. Squad
Art House
HD Talk
Silent DVD

discussion forum
DVD Talk Forum

Resources
DVD Price Search
Customer Service #'s
RCE Info
Links

Columns




Judgment at Nuremberg

MGM // Unrated // September 7, 2004
List Price: $14.95 [Buy now and save at Amazon]

Review by Stuart Galbraith IV | posted August 15, 2004 | E-mail the Author
Stanley Kramer is singularly unfashionable among cineastes. His movies aren't given much serious consideration in scholarly film magazines, or shown by hip film societies. By their standards, he was Hollywood's homogenized liberal, who wore his heart on both sleeves in a series of well meaning but ponderous message films. This was perhaps best symbolized by Kramer's 1967 hit Guess Who's Coming to Dinner, a film about interracial marriage that was criticized by the left at least as much as it was by the right. How could liberal parents Katharine Hepburn and Spencer Tracy possibly object, they said, to a prospective son-in-law as good and handsome and polite and educated and rich as Sidney Poitier? Few critics even seem to realize the film was a comedy, and a very good one at that.

Kramer's last film was the dreary The Runner Stumbles (1979), and many would argue that Kramer himself had been stumbling professionally in the decades prior to his death in 2001. This reviewer remembers him in his last year at the Hollywood Collector's Show in North Hollywood, by then quite ill and in a wheelchair, selling signed copies of his autobiography and looking very much a forgotten man. His later film projects went nowhere, and quite unfairly he was ignored by the film industry at large. He never received an honorary Oscar, an AFI Lifetime Achievement Award, or similar recognition.

It's true his later films were mostly misguided or turgid, but they were nothing if not sincere -- check out Bless the Beasts and Children (1972), a very weird but oddly compelling little film about saving buffalos. Conversely, he was one of the best and most socially progressive producers of the 1950s, and directed a string of very fine films beginning in the late '40s. As a producer, he made cutting edge movies as diverse as Champion, Home of the Brave (both 1949), Death of a Salesman (1951), High Noon, and The 5,000 Fingers of Dr. T (1952). He began directing his own projects soon thereafter, hitting his stride with The Defiant Ones (1958), On the Beach (1959), and Inherit the Wind (1960).

The best of his films as a director though is certainly Judgment at Nuremberg (1961), the war crimes courtroom drama adapted from Abby Mann's famous television play, that had originally been produced as an April 1959 episode of Playhouse 90. The three-hour movie version is a bit overlong (people take l-o-o-o-n-g walks to and from the witness box), but in its longer form addresses such complex -- and for its time, very controversial -- issues such as global culpability for Hitler's rise to power.

The fictionalized account of one such Nuremberg Trial is set long after high profile Nazis such as Hermann Goring, Albert Speer, and Rudolf Hess have been sentenced or committed suicide. Instead, Republican Chief Judge Dan Heywood (Spencer Tracy) arrives at Nuremberg to sit in judgment of Nazi judges, including Dr. Ernst Janning (Burt Lancaster), a revered legal and constitutional scholar many Germans believe shouldn't be on trial at all.

As the Cold War emerges in the background, as the Soviet Union invades Czechoslovakia and tensions flair in Berlin, Heywood and prosecuting attorneys like Colonel Lawson (Richard Widmark) are pressured to go easy on a people whose proximity to the rising Iron Curtain becomes essential to the free world's defense strategy. In other words, they are asked to politicize their verdicts just as the German judges on trial had been pressured 15 years earlier.

The case has myriad ramifications, as demonstrated by brilliant defense attorney Hans Rolfe (Maximilian Schell, reprising his role from the TV version). Who is the braver man, he asks, one who flees Germany with the rise of the Third Reich, or the man who stays to try and serve his country's best interests? While judges like Janning admittedly ordered the sterilization of political undesirables, he is also shown to have personally saved the lives of others at his own peril.

And if Germany is guilty, what about the American industrialists who profited in rebuilding Germany's military might, or Winston Churchill, who praised Hitler's leadership as late as 1938?

It's questions like these that give Judgment at Nuremberg its teeth. There really was nothing like it until the superb television movie Nuremberg (2000), which also comes highly recommended. Nothing is cut-and-dried, and writer Mann gives even minor characters such as Haywood's aide (William Shatner, in one of his first film roles) and servants (Virginia Christine and Ben Wright) extraordinary depth. Ultimately, nationalism proves Germany's undoing as a whole, and for these the judges who knew better and who were in a position to challenge Hitler, it is their willingness to deny justice in the name of expediency and their "country's best interests." Of course, nothing like this could happen today, right?

The film is a real powerhouse of talent, with no less than four Oscar-nominated performances. Tracy is said to have been Kramer's alter ego in the four films they made together, the common sense Everyman of which Tracy specialized and had no peer. He's superb here -- that great, deeply etched face so effortlessly expressive. Montgomery Clift, in one of his last roles, appears in just one long scene, but it's quite extraordinary. As Rudolph Petersen, a victim of sterilization, Clift is unnervingly, harrowingly authentic. If not for his fame in Hollywood, one might assume he had been picked off the streets. Judy Garland is also quite good as Irene Hoffman, a German woman falsely convicted of illegal sexual relations with an old man, a Jew, who had been a friend of the family for years.

All three were rightly nominated for Oscars, but the only actor to win the award for Judgment at Nuremberg was Maximilian Schell, who is never less than riveting as the mercurial, yet somehow humanist defense attorney.

Some have accused Richard Widmark of being one-note as prosecuting attorney Lawson, but his single-minded swaggering, as it turns out, is dramatically justified. Of the leading cast, only Burt Lancaster, in inadequate makeup, is a disappointment. He's good but miscast, in a role better served by an actor less familiar to audiences. Marlene Dietrich is also excellent in an uncomfortable role she knew all too well: the German trying to come to terms with a simultaneous love and shame for her country.

Kramer's direction gives his top-drawer cast plenty of room, occasionally punching their scenes with interesting camera work (by Ernest Laszlo) that frequently circles actors during long stretches of dialogue with 360-degree tracking shots. These are generally done to good effect, with Kramer using the background to emphasize particular lines of dialogue, or to link characters to one another. He also seems to be one of the first to use the zoom as an aesthetic device, for punctuation, though the effect would become a cliche within just a few years.

The film uses a marvelous device to get around the language barrier. Early scenes have the Germans speaking German, the Americans English. Everyone listens to translations on headphones from simultaneous interpreters shown behind a glass wall. Kramer's camera slowly rises up above the level of the glass, and in a flash-zoom on Maximilian Schell, in mid-sentence his speech suddenly switches from German to English. In other words, German characters continue to speak in German, only we the audience hear all the dialogue in English. The effect is so seamless, one suspects many watching the film will not even notice what has happened.

Other technical credits are excellent. The film makes good use of Nuremberg locations, while Ernest Gold's score, mostly adaptations of military marches and folk songs ("Lili Marlene" is shrewdly worked into one scene with Dietrich) is very effective. The film also has an excellent title design (by an uncredited Saul Bass?).

Video & Audio

Frustratingly, this is one of those MGM titles not anamorphically enhanced on the argument that 1.66:1 widescreen titles don't benefit in 16:9 format. Where virtually every other major label in the world does 16:9 transfers of 1.66:1 films, MGM's policy has steadily been that 1.66:1 titles (or 1.85:1 titles wrongly believed to be 1.66:1, a common error with this label) are transferred in 4:3 letterboxed format, though even they've made exceptions, such as the first three Bond movies. If anyone at MGM would like to make the case against 16:9 transfers of 1.66:1 films, this reviewer will gladly post their rebuttal here. At least this 4:3 transfer looks very good for what it is, and doesn't suffer too badly reformatted for widescreen sets. This DVD includes an overture and exit music, though no intermission. Sound options include the original English mono plus a new 5.1 mix with much directional dialogue, and which works in tandem with Kramer's roving camera. Subtitles are available in English, French, and Spanish.

Extra Features

The best of the extras is a nearly 20-minute In Conversation with Abby Mann and Maximilian Schell. In what turned out to be an inspired idea, the writer and actor simply and casually chat face-to-face with one another about the project. After a few minutes of mutual admiration, they really warm to the subject, making pointed, spirited observations about the work and, among other things, discuss the TV version (both pay tribute to Claude Rains, who played Tracy's part on TV); Maximilian's status for years in Germany as "the little brother of Maria Schell,"; their collaboration years later on a Broadway version, in which Schell played Lancaster's role.

The six-minute The Value of a Single Human Being focuses on Mann's script, and he reflects on its relevance then and now. A Tribute to Stanley Kramer, running 14 minutes, is only okay, consisting mainly of an interview with Kramer's wife from 1965 until his death, the actress Karen Sharpe (The Disorderly Orderly). All three featurettes are in 4:3 standard format.

Also included is a fairly detailed Photo Gallery and a Trailer, the latter in 4:3 matted format.

Parting Thoughts

All the talk about the Playhouse 90 version makes you wish MGM had somehow included it on a second disc, an obvious but probably legally unfeasible supplement. (Besides the TV movie of Nuremberg, interested parties should also check out Schell's great documentary on Dietrich, Marlene).

It may be unhip to admire a Stanley Kramer movie, but Judgment at Nuremberg really is a great film. If it weren't for the lack of anamorphic enhancement, this would unhesitatingly earn a spot on DVD Talk's Collector's Series. Even so, this is still a must-see DVD, and comes Highly Recommended.

Stuart Galbraith IV is a Los Angeles and Kyoto-based film historian whose work includes The Emperor and the Wolf -- The Lives and Films of Akira Kurosawa and Toshiro Mifune. His new book, Cinema Nippon will be published by Taschen in 2005.

Buy from Amazon.com

C O N T E N T

V I D E O

A U D I O

E X T R A S

R E P L A Y

A D V I C E
Highly Recommended

E - M A I L
this review to a friend
Popular Reviews

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links