
THE STRAIGHT DOPE:
The project of figuring out what happened on September
11th encompasses politics, economics, history and
emotion. But there was another mystery that needed to
be solved: Why did the towers of the World Trade Center collapse less than an hour after
the attacks? This question has been asked by a couple
of documentaries: A&E's Why
the Towers Fell and The Learning Channel's
World Trade Center: Anatomy of the Collapse. Of
the two, Anatomy of the Collapse is more
critical of the design of the towers. It's clear in
both pieces that there were some fundamental flaws in
the design that made the collapse inevitable once the
damage was done but Anatomy of the Collapse has
an almost accusatory tone.
The brunt of the
criticism is structural engineer Leslie Robertson, who
appears in both programs and numerous other pieces on
the Trade Center. He's the haunted chief designer of
the Trade Center whose punishment, apparently, is to
recite over and over for the cameras that he blames
himself for the tragedy. It's hard to watch and a
responsible filmmaker at this point would drop the
issue. (To be fair, it's not clear which program
interviewed Robertson first.) His eyes are ringed with
heavy lines and his body is hunched over in a serious
slouch. There's even one moment when describing some
great achievement in his design for the buildings that
he works up a bit of enthusiasm and a smile. Then he
catches himself referring to the towers in the present
tense, corrects himself and clearly all the anguish
and self-doubt come flooding back.
The problem with Robertson's design was that, while
they were visionary enough to plan the building with a
direct hit from the world's largest jet plane at the
time (a Boeing 707), they didn't take the jet fuel
fire from the explosion into account. They also didn't
allow that planes would increase in size over the
years. These oversights proved fatal as the trusses
that formed the floors and that held the innovative
steel tube outer structure to the central core of the
building began to warp and bend from the heat. Once
the structure of the trusses was compromised it was
only a matter of time before the building would
collapse in on itself.
At only 45 minutes Anatomy of the Collapse
doesn't feel as comprehensive as Why the Towers
Fell. The latter featured a number of simulated
computer models of the event that made clear exactly
what happened to the structure. Why the Towers
Fell also was built around the expertise of the
investigators conducting the official investigation
into the collapse. Anatomy of the Collapse does
consult a number of experts but somehow doesn't
approach the material with as much of an open mind.
VIDEO:
The full-frame video mostly looks like fine broadcast
video. There are moments when the compression is
glaringly evident, however.
AUDIO:
The Dolby Digital 2.0 audio is fine.
EXTRAS:
There are no extras.
FINAL THOUGHTS:
While not as in-depth as another DVD on exactly the
same subject matter, World Trade Center: Anatomy of
the Collapse goes a good way towards explaining
how the damage occurred. For that it's worth a look,
but no one needs to see both programs.
World Trade Center / 9/11 Related Reviews
9/11
WTC-
The First 24 Hours
New
York Firefighters: The Brotherhood of 9/11
Why
the Towers Fell
World
Trade Center: Anatomy of the Collapse
World
Trade Center - A Modern Marvel 1973-2001
Email Gil Jawetz at cinemagotham@yahoo.com