GantzLiveReview
THE
INTRODUCTION:
Gantz
is a highly
successful series that began as a Manga (i.e. a 'Japanese comic', for
those of
you who are not familiar with the term) created by Hiroya Oku. It then
went on
to become a cult favorite anime series that has a dedicated fan-base
within the
United States. Undoubtedly, the producers were intent upon reaching out
to that
overseas audience, and a special world premiere was held in movie
theaters
across the US for a live action Japanese Gantz
film on Thursday, January 20th, 2011. This
review is for those interested in the
quality of the film itself, as well as the presentation it received as
a LIVE EVENT
(which included a Q&A session after the film premiere).
THE FILM:
Gantz has a rather bizarre storyline: Characters that appear
to have died from one method or another appear moments later in a room
with a
giant black ball named (you guessed it!): Gantz.
These characters have apparently been given a chance to live again by
participating in a fight against a variety of supposed
baddies from outer-space. The problem with the storyline
being presented is that if these characters die while battling they die
completely. No more second chances at
living after losing all life during a Gantz
battle! However, if you can beat a
round (which usually lasts for twenty minutes for some whacked-out
reason) you
might be able to win some cool points that just might be redeemable for
something
pretty, well, nifty: a complete
return to your normal life or a chance to bring back someone who has
died.
On the subject of living or dying, Health is also
completely
returned to normal when you are zapped back magically to the weird room
with
the Gantz ball. Just
remember that if you want to get enough
points for a prize you pretty much have to learn to become a killer
first. That
can be a tough selling point. What exactly are the morals of these
characters
anyway?! They are never given a real explanation as to why they should
kill the
alien 'baddies' and they do their killin' anyway despite this drawback
(usually
as the instigators of a fight too). This
is an observation worth being made about the film.
If you are a fan of the Gantz manga or anime you will
probably find some aspects of this version to be both disappointing and
entertaining.
Certain plot points are faithfully reproduced (the 'green onion' alien
episode plays
a huge role in the film) while other moments are tinkered with beyond
recognition. Unlike the anime (which
seemed to suggest that morals play a huge role in the overall story),
this film
does not touch on the issue of killing in much negative light. The
story doesn't
focus on the overall importance of the actions made by these
characters. I feel
like the anime makes viewers genuinely feel as though the story is
somehow
about the evil within people and how far certain individuals might be
willing to
go to screw over one another, so that there are moral obliterations for
everyone. None of that dark, nasty, scathing vibe is to be found here...
for
better or for worse. I'm guessing any real fan will be pretty upset
over this crucial
underlying difference to some degree.
Perhaps the biggest difference between versions is that one
of the lead characters, Kei Kurono (Kazunari Ninomiya) is basically nothing like the character fans came to
know and love/hate. In the anime Kei was a total asshole with real,
deep-seeded
issues. The Kei of the
live action version is practically the nicest guy around
in comparison. Kei comes across as an entirely different person now.
Personally, I kind of disliked the Kei character in the anime so I
almost
appreciated this drastic change. It does alter some of the importance
behind the
character though and I'm sure that will be unforgivable for some. The other lead characters Masaru Kato (Kenichi
Matsuyama) and Tae
Kojima (Yuriko Yoshitaka) seemed
to be more faithfully reproduced for this adaptation though their
backgrounds
are not entirely the same as what some might be expecting.
I think that a lot of fans are going to debate this film, if
only because on some level it is a merely average production. It
features
cheesy special effects galore that will definitely not compare to giant
Hollywood productions. They are passably
decent but never fully engrossing or convincing. On
the plus side, the costumes, locations, and
sets were pretty impressive and reminded me quite a bit of what we
found in the
anime. At least those aspects were highly enjoyable to see as fully
realized aspects
of this incarnation. I must admit to also being surprised by the
performances
and direction (by Shinsuke Sato). My
expectations
were met and surpassed in those areas. You won't find Oscar quality
material
here, but given the type of film this is just keep expectations in
check and it's
going to be a pretty good time out at the movies. There's a lot of
creative camerawork
and the actors know how to keep you entertained even when the story
doesn't
seem to understand what is and isn't working. Music
lovers will also notice the excellent
new score by the now legendary composer Kenji Kawaii, which was
certainly a
highlight that brought some added depth when it was needed.
|
 |
For the record: Fans of gratuitousness are bound
to be at
least somewhat irritated. The action and sex is heavily toned down.
Some will
call this censorship; others will say it's unfaithfulness to the source
material, and many more will insist it was simply done as a way to sell
more
movie tickets to teenagers. Alas, it's undoubtedly a combination of all
these
things. Though the violence is still pretty extreme in certain scenes
(I
certainly wouldn't dare to call the stuff shown as 'tame') it doesn't
come
close to what was found in the anime series. As for sexual content:
this time
it is practically non-existent, though you do get a few good lingering
shots of
a well-groomed cast (and these moments will likely appeal to either
gender or
orientation). There is no explicit
nudity to be found anywhere though - don't get your hopes up if you're
a perv
like the original Kei was.
Last but not least, Gantz
has a slightly misleading title. It's only the first of two live-action
releases planned for 2011 (the second of which will arrive in the
winter). The movie feels complete but
never seems to
work as a whole. When the film ends you will likely want to immediately
watch
the second part (if you enjoyed the first). That may or may not be a
good thing
for some viewers. As it stands right now, I am unsure if some of the
issues I
had with the conclusion resulted from the story being split into two
separate parts
or if it just means the story feels inherently flawed from its
inception. It may simply be the failings
of this live
action adaptation.

While genuine devotees are exactly the kind of
people I expect
to have viewed this film already with the world premiere, I may be a
rare
exception to that rule (I had yet to finish the series by the time I
entered a darkened
theater). Those unfamiliar with past
versions of Gantz may have few if any major qualms with the film. Those
who are
familiar but not diehard fans may react similarly to me. Should viewers
be
prepared to give the film a proper chance upon its inevitable home
media release?
I would say so. The movie is never boring and it's actually a lot of
fun if
viewed with a certain mindset. However, if you are a huge Gantz
fan and expect a totally faithful adaptation I can only
reinforce now that your dreams of a perfect live action adaptation will
be
crushed upon seeing the end results. It is not entirely faithful, nor
is it
entirely perfect. But it is fun. As long as you can accept that simple
fact you
might have a good time. This live action incarnation truly represents
an
entertaining if slightly mixed bag of sci-fi goodness for genre
devotees.
THE FATHOM
WORLD
PREMIERE EVENT:

In addition to the film itself the world
premiere event was
also a decidedly mixed affair.
Good Decision #1:
The idea behind the event itself was pure gold.
I'd be lying
if I said I didn't appreciate the opportunity to see a Japanese film at
around
the same time it opens wide in Japan (actually, we got to see it
earlier: Gantz was screened on January 20th,
2011 and will open wide in Japan on January 29th, 2011) .
I'd be
willing to wager that the people who attended this film premiere would
also be
willing to see other foreign films this way (even if they are unrelated
to an
anime series). I seriously hope and desire to see more films receive
this kind
of release and will cross my fingers that this is only the start to a
wonderful
new way of global film inter-connectivity to come in the near future.
Note to Funimation:
You might want to consider the
possibility of partnering with Fathom for similar events for anime
films. The
upcoming releases of Summer Wars and Evangelion
2.22 would be more accessible
to anime fans if released through this method of presentation as they
would be
playing on a greater number of screens across the nation.
Good Decision #2:
The lead actors who participated in the Q&A session (Kenichi
Matsuyama and Kazunari Ninomiya) were great sports who seemed happy to
answer
fan questions. Both men did a good job of entertaining their audience.
Kenichi
may have given some ridiculously long answers when one considers that
his
translator had a nearly impossible task of trying to remember
everything he was
saying, but this was forgivable given the nature of the event.
Hopefully more
planning will be done prior to the release of the second Gantz
film so issues like this won't continue to arise.
Mistake #1:
>
Showing the film with an English dub instead of
with the original language
track and subtitles. No one in the audience I attended the film with
seemed to
be enjoying this dub, and with good reason. It's a decent dub when
compared to
other live-action films but it also dramatically decreases the level
of
enjoyment fans could have had by watching the film as it was meant to
be seen.
Whoever made the decision to only present the film in a dubbed version
made a
mistake and hopefully this is corrected with the release of the second Gantz film in North American theaters. (Note:
This dub was not done with the same VA's who worked on the Anime
series.)
Mistake #2:
Having a very uninteresting (and clearly bored)
host in charge of the Q&A
session following the premiere of the film. Whoever this host was... he
absolutely
failed to do a good job with keeping an appropriate pace for the
presentation.
The host also asked some really stupid questions (example:
How would you feel if you got nominated for an Oscar for
this?), and seemed downright bored and irritated by being
the host. If he wasn't interested in participating in this
event then why should the fans who paid good money to see this in a
movie
theater?
>
Neil Lumbard is a lifelong fan of cinema, and a student who aspires to make movies. He loves writing, and currently does in Texas.