Reviews & Columns
Reviews
DVD
TV on DVD
Blu-ray
4K UHD
International DVDs
In Theaters
Reviews by Studio
Video Games

Features
Collector Series DVDs
Easter Egg Database
Interviews
DVD Talk Radio
Feature Articles

Columns
Anime Talk
DVD Savant
Horror DVDs
The M.O.D. Squad
Art House
HD Talk
Silent DVD

discussion forum
DVD Talk Forum

Resources
DVD Price Search
Customer Service #'s
RCE Info
Links

Columns




Getting out of Rhode Island

Film Threat // Unrated // June 29, 2004
List Price: $19.99 [Buy now and save at Amazon]

Review by Robert Spuhler | posted April 29, 2004 | E-mail the Author
The Movie:

The independent film world puts a great deal of emphasis on being creative, doing something new, doing something different from what Hollywood puts out. After all, true indie film is done on shoestring budgets with unrecognizable faces; if a film with those limitations is trying to tell the same story as a studio pic with $5 million to spend, it is obvious which will be more watchable.

To that end, Getting Out of Rhode Island is an unqualified success. It is certainly creative. It uses it's budgetary and technological limitations to its advantage to tell a story not often seen – at least, not this way – in bigger budget productions.

However, Getting Out of Rhode Island fails on a more important issue to the viewer. It is simply not interesting.

Jacob Mattison has come home to Rhode Island as a successful Hollywood actor, but with "self-medicating" demons to fight. His childhood friend Morgan has grown jealous over the years, but sets up a "Welcome Home" party in order to raise money for his own film production company. Getting Out of Rhode Island is simply that party in real time.

Getting Out of Rhode Island was shot in one evening over the course of two and a half hours. The only time the cameras stopped was to switch digital videotapes. Also, all of the dialogue was improvised; most of the characters don't even know what the plot of the finished product will be.

Improvisational theatre is much more difficult than most actors seem to think. There are full schools devoted to learning how to effectively improvise. At places like Second City, the Groundlings and Improv Olympic, students take classes for months before they are able to improvise a three-minute scene. The actors in Getting Out of Rhode Island simply aren't at a level where they can keep up for a full film and remain interesting. It's interesting to watch each character get their self-prepared lines out early in the film, then slowly see their characters deteriorate.

There are also no likeable characters here, at least among the main ones. Jacob is someone who moved away, forgot where he came from and turned to booze to fill that void. Morgan is basically blackmailing his former friend. Morgan's partner in the film company is a wannabe-Hollywood phony. There's no tension when there's no rooting interest.

The DVD

Video:

Getting Out of Rhode Island is presented in a matted widescreen format (though the box says that the film is in 1.33:1 full frame). It's hard to judge a film like this in a technical sense. This was clearly a film shot on no budget, and the picture reflects that. Everything is grainy, to the point in some scenes of being unwatchable. Director Christian de Rezendes stuck to most tenets of the Dogme95 (or "Dogma," as the film's official site calls it) manifesto, including artificial lighting; it takes ideal conditions to pull that off and a 100-minute movie shot fully indoors (except for one outdoor night scene) are not said conditions.

Sound:

Sound for the film is done with one shotgun microphone on top of the camera and wireless lavalier mics on the main characters. Therefore, when there is dialogue from anyone who isn't a main character, it is muffled, as the shotgun mic picked up too much sound from the rest of the party to be particularly useful.

Extras:

There is a full-length commentary track with de Rezendes, film critic Jeremiah Kipp and David Malsch, the founder of the Black Point Film Festival (Getting Out of Rhode Island won the Best Feature and Best Director awards there in 2003). Most of the commentary is Kipp asking de Rezendes questions, and the director responding in cliché moviespeak. For instance, after the title card there is a flash, probably no longer than a second, of a point-of-view shot of driving down a road. De Rezendes' reasoning? "I just wanted a flash of something to force the audience to start asking questions." It does, of course – "What was that supposed to be?" would be one. "Did the editor screw up?" would be another. But none of the "questions" would be actually drawing the audience into the film. It would be, in fact, keeping them out.

Another gem from later in the commentary from de Rezendes: "We wanted to give the impression that this was half-assed, and we threw it together at the last minute." So, you wanted the viewer to not be involved in the movie, and instead sit above it and wonder about the filming process?

There's a 30-minute segment on the disc of the entire cast and crew getting together back in the house where the film was shot and congratulating themselves. There also a three-minute ad for the film's soundtrack with the musicians, cast and crew bios, and trailers for this film and Larry's Home Video.

Final Thoughts:

In fairness to Getting Out of Rhode Island, it did find its way into some film festivals, including winning major awards at Black Point. Clearly there is something here worth seeing, and it is refreshing to see a film that tries to be this original. But originality in this situation comes at the expense of quality, leaving Getting Out of Rhode Island to become a failed experiment.

Buy from Amazon.com

C O N T E N T

V I D E O

A U D I O

E X T R A S

R E P L A Y

A D V I C E
Skip It

E - M A I L
this review to a friend
Popular Reviews

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links