<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:review="//www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/">
    <channel>
        <title>DVD Talk DVD Reviews</title> 
        <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/list/DVD Video</link> 
        <description>DVD Talk DVD Review RSS Feed</description> 
        <language>en-us</language>
    
                    <item>
                                <title>Orwell Rolls in His Grave</title>
                <category>DVD Video</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/17878</link>
                <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 02:04:16 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/17878"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B0008237AA.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><strong>The Movie:</strong><br><imgsrc="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/127/1119838514.jpg"align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="200" height="150">Oneof the best things about writing for DVD Talk is having an editorthat trusts his staff of writers. We are never stifled,influenced, or told what to say about a particular title simplyto cater to a certain studio or DVD release. Having this kind offreedom is what allows us to be extremely honest and not followany bandwagon buzz about a highly anticipated disc. That beingsaid, I think what we have here at DVD Talk is probably prettyrare in the grand scheme of the media (be it TV, radio, Internet,etc) world. And while may people might think the Internet is thelast truly free medium, I'd wager to say that there's plenty ofdishonesty and manipulation afoot there as well. It may not be onas quite a large scale as television, but the next few y...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/17878">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Flyerman</title>
                <category>DVD Video</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/16675</link>
                <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 07:57:54 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/16675"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B0008237AU.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a>We all delude ourselves now and then. We all like to create scenarios in our mind where we are above reproach, loved by all, or accepted for everything we stand for. And occasionally, we even act on such self-deception. We'll pursue a relationship with someone who actually can't stand us, knowing inside ourselves that no one can possible reject what we are. We will ask for a raise, believing that no employer could possible deny the skill and competency you show at work, when the truth is far more telling. Some of us will even take pen to paper and bang out paragraph after paragraph of prose believing that we're writing the great American novel. Of course, it usually ends up in the trash bin when the truth comes to tell us just how duped and dumb we really are.<p> Yet there are some people who are not threatened by such reality checks. Indeed they are so far gone into their own little world that what is...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/16675">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Rock Opera</title>
                <category>DVD Video</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/16352</link>
                <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2005 01:43:32 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/16352"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B0007G8FNG.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><font size="2" face="Verdana">Finally, I have found <i>the</i> Go-Kart Films release I've been looking for. As an avid supporter of indie cinema, it always kills me how bad most of it is. And I'm not just talking about the amateur acting and micro-budgets. I mean, there have been some recent independent films that I had high hopes for, only to watch as their intriguing concepts get squandered by pedestrian, conservative filmmaking. Where's the audacity anymore? It used to be that these films banked on the one thing that most big budget Hollywood films can't: total creative control. While Go-Kart Films is only the distributor of these films, movies like <A HREF="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=16120"><b>Tweeked</b></a>, <A HREF="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=15660"><b>Ball Of Wax</b></a> and <A HREF="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=16119"><b>The Thrillbillys</b></a> al...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/16352">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>The Thrillbillys</title>
                <category>DVD Video</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/16119</link>
                <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 20:52:20 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Skip It</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/16119"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B0006A9ILQ.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><font size="2" face="Verdana">Go-Kart Films is a company whose releases, almost each and every one of which, have intrigued me. With such tremendously named titles as <b>Operation Midnight Climax</b>, <A HREF="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=16120"><b>Tweeked</b></a> and <b>FROGGG!</b>, these films just beg to be watched. My first experience with the company, <A HREF="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=15660"><b>Ball Of Wax</b></a>, was a less than stellar experience, but how could a movie called <b>The Thrillbillys</b> <i>not</i> be required viewing? Sadly, I was about to find out.<p><b>The Thrillbillys</b> wants so badly to be a 60's Southern Exploitation flick, à la Hershell Gordon Lewis' <b>Moonshine Mountain</b> or </b>2,000 Maniacs</b> you can practically taste it. Somewhere among the shoe-string budget, the ready, willing and unable actors, the 'psychobilly' soundtrack, the e...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/16119">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Tweeked</title>
                <category>DVD Video</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/16120</link>
                <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 20:52:20 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Skip It</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/16120"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B0007G8FN6.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><font size="2" face="Verdana"><b>Tweeked</b> has a quote on the front cover calling it "<b>THE</b> meth movie," which definitely got my attention, but after watching it I had to ask "How could a movie about meth be <i>so</i> boring?" I've heard great things about that <i>other</i> meth movie, <b>Spun</b>, but can't really comment on it because I personally haven't seen it. Still, I figured that a movie about speed would actually be fast paced. <b>Tweeked</b> was the visual equivalent of Ritalin as I found myself losing attention again and again.<p>Following the misadventures of those two girls that we've all known at some point in our lives, the spoiled suburbanites who think that they're edgy and dangerous because they do drugs and sometimes hang out with unseemly people. The ones who dumpster dive for some extra cash mommy and daddy refuse to pony up for their habit, yet somehow still manage to have ...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/16120">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Reflections of Evil</title>
                <category>DVD Video</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/15820</link>
                <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 01:35:24 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/15820"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B00073K8CA.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a>Now, there are cult movies and then there are CULT movies.  There are movies that gradually find exposure and a dedicated audience. There are movies that barely make a whimper initially and take years to catch on. And, there are movies so notorious and/or scarce they become the stuff of back alley legend.<P><I>Reflections of Evil</I> (2002) may be the first modern, digital equivalent of the underground cult film. Its origins are the usual grassroots, one man show, cult story. With some inheritance money in hand, Damon Packard set out to make his own movie. Set out, in wild abandon, with a rough idea, some inspiration, 16 and 8 mm cameras, a library of his favorite sound sources and 70's television clips, and a Mac with Final Cut Pro. While it made the rounds to some festivals, what really set Packard apart from the pack of unknowns trying to get their indie feature seen was his approach to distributing...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/15820">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Charlie's Death Wish</title>
                <category>DVD Video</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/15751</link>
                <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 03:28:15 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Skip It</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/15751"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B0007L86NK.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><b>The Movie:</b><br><p>The first thing you'll notice when you pick up a copy of Jeff Leroy's <b>Charlie's Death Wish</b> is a big ol' picture of Ron Jeremy on the front cover art. If you look a little closer, you'll also notice Lemmy of <b>Motorhead</b> on there too, standing on the left next to the hot chick who plays the lead. You'd think that the combination of Lemmy and the Hedgehog would be a winner, wouldn't you? They've both got their own kind of special charm and while neither have a reputation for delivering Oscar worth performances, they've been fun in the bit parts they've had in mainstream cinema every now and then, adding a little bit of class to films like Troma's finest moment, <b>Citizen Toxie</b>. Throw in Tracii Guns of L.A. glam rock band <b>L.A. Guns</b> and Dizzy Reed formerly of <b>Guns N Roses</b> and a couple of hot girls, and all of a sudden this starts to smell like a recipe ...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/15751">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Frog-g-g!</title>
                <category>DVD Video</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/15741</link>
                <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 06:35:05 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Skip It</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/15741"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B0007L86NA.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><b>The Movie</b><p>Intended to be a tongue-in-cheek homage to the 1970's "horny mutated monster on the loose" subgenre (think <i>Humanoids from the Deep</i> without the deep and insightful social commentary), the stupidly named <i>Frog-g-g!</i> delivers about 77 minutes of broad and obvious cliches and stereotypes ... but does precisely nothing with them.<p>Director Cody Jarrett doesn't want to make a gory, scary horror movie, and clearly he doesn't have the skill to mount an <i>Airplane!</i>-type spoof, so his movie feels less like an homage and more life a low-rent ripoff. The fact that <i>Frog-g-g!</i> has a light tone and a silly approach simply indicates that everyone on-set probably had a pretty good time making the thing ... without really giving much thought to if the viewer's having any fun.<p>Here's the scoop, for the eleven of you who might not have heard this tune before: an evil chemical c...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/15741">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Ball Of Wax</title>
                <category>DVD Video</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/15660</link>
                <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2005 21:38:20 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Rent It</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/15660"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B00073K7ZI.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><font size="2" face="Verdana">If nothing else, writer/director Daniel Kraus hit a home run by casting indie actor Mark Mench in his sophomore DV effort, <b>Ball Of Wax</b>. A tale about the dark side of America's national pastime, Bret Packard (Mench) is MVP for the championship Carolina Devils. However, being the top player for the top team in the country leaves him bored, so he devises a series of challenges, for both himself and his team, that soon spiral out of control until mayhem, madness and murder loom large over the playing field. <p>Not so much a statement about professional sports or professional athletes, <b>Ball Of Wax</b> is more along the lines of <b>American Psycho</b>, where America's worship of public Idols and wealth corrupts ones very soul. Mench is reminiscent of America's one-time poster boy, Derek Jeter (the film was shot around 2003), only Packard is the anti-Jeter. Sure he's th...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/15660">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Operation Midnight Climax</title>
                <category>DVD Video</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/13950</link>
                <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:50:33 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Skip It</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/13950"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1105379622.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a>Originality is hard to come by in movies nowadays. Hollywood in particular never met an idea it couldn't beat into the ground. Some Tinsel Town tent pegs – CGI, romantic comedy, the sex farce – have been smashed into the substrata of the Earth so forcefully and often that it would take a stake puller the size of British Columbia to yank them out of the tired turf. Every once in a while, someone will come along and reinvent a genre or enliven a dying idea and "BINGO", people will pile on like rugby players during a scrum. But soon, after the 37th remake or 65th homage, said novelty is as old and worn out as the convention being circumvented the first time around (wire-fu, anyone?).<p>That is why people champion the chickpeas out of independent cinema. They look at these outsider auteurs putting their pre-natal visions of viable artistry up on the screen and jizz their jeans in unabashed love letteri...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/13950">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Ding-a-Ling-Less</title>
                <category>DVD Video</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/13909</link>
                <pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2005 06:14:46 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Highly Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/13909"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1104642594.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><small>"Maintaining a penis is a simple task.  You take care of it just like a little child: you give it a bath once a day, when it gets wet, you put a little rainsuit on it so it doesn't get sick, and you beat it every once in a while."</small><br><br><i>Ding-a-Ling-Less</i> is about one man's search for a penis.<br><br><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/1/1104642388.jpg" width="275" height="150" border="1" align="right">No, it's not <b><i>that</i></b> kind of movie, not that there'd be anything wrong with that.  It's about Jack Peterson (Kirk Wilson), who ekes out a modest but comfortable life in a sleepy North Carolina town.  He builds birdhouses for a living, pals around with his womanizing best friend Alan (Robert Longstreet), and lives in a nice little townhouse.  There's only one thing he's really missing -- a penis.  With his having been lopped off a couple decades ago, Jac...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/13909">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>