<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:review="//www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/">
    <channel>
        <title>DVD Talk DVD Reviews</title> 
        <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/list/DVD Video</link> 
        <description>DVD Talk DVD Review RSS Feed</description> 
        <language>en-us</language>
    
                    <item>
                                <title>Venom</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/73392</link>
                <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 18:13:34 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Rent It</b>
               <p><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/full/1539884999_1.jpg" width="650" height="366"></center><br><b>Director: Ruben Fleischer</b><br><b>Starring:  Tom Hardy, Riz Ahmed, Michelle Williams</b><br><b>Year: 2018</b><p align="justify">It was hoped that <i><a href="http://archeravenue.net/movie-review-captain-america-civil-war/">Captain America: Civil War</a></i> and <i><a href="http://archeravenue.net/dvd-review-mad-max-fury-road/">Mad Max: Fury Road</a></i> had each shone a spotlight on the correct path for superhero and action which would come after to follow. So that those films could learn from the mistakes of the past, see how it could be done differently, and to make the necessary changes to stop being so crappy.  <i>Civil War</i> was an amazing superhero movie, the best Marvel had created, and <i>Fury Road</i> was a perfect adventure film, giving fans everything they d...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/73392">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>White Boy Rick</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/73326</link>
                <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 18:14:49 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/73326"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1537467283.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/full/1537464549_1.jpg" width="650" height="341"></center><br><b>Director: Yann Damange</b><br><b>Starring:  Richie Merritt, Matthew McConaughey, Bel Powley</b><br><b>Year: 2018</b><p align="justify"><i>White Boy Rick</i> is painfully mediocre, and anyone who says differently is selling something.  This is a true story, and it's hard to believe, so that's an immediate boon to the film, a plot that's so outrageous it must be true.  Throw in Matthew McConaughey for good measure and you've got our attention, but our attention isn't enough.  You need to get our approval as well, and that can't be earned without some hard work and some real talent.  The story is there for the telling, but it lacks the punch needed to surprise us.  The setting is as desolate as you can imagine, but we need the action therein to be more than predictable.  And ...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/73326">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>The Dark Tower</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/72298</link>
                <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 19:23:31 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Rent It</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/72298"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1502306560.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/full/1502301155_2.jpg" width="650" height="366"></center><br><b>Director: Nikolaj Arcel</b><br><b>Starring: Idris Elba, Tom Taylor, Matthew McConaughey</b><br><b>Year: 2017</b><p align="justify">You'd have to run a poll to get anything near some accurate statistics, but the number of those who see the <i>Dark Tower</i> movie has got to be exponentially higher than the number who have also read the entire <i>Dark Tower</i> series.  And of course, that's not counting the connected side stories, the extra book written into the sequence, and the literal dozens of Stephen King books that tie in; <i>Hearts in Atlantis, The Stand, 'Salem's Lot, Insomnia</i>, etc.  My point being, only an extremely small number of audience members will be up on the magnum opus and all its connected plots that is King's masterwork.  I just happen to be both a f...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/72298">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Spider-Man: Homecoming</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/72225</link>
                <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 03:04:07 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/72225"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1499914994.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/full/1499909826_2.jpg" width="650" height="302"></center><br><b>Director: Jon Watts</b><br><b>Starring: Tom Holland, Michael Keaton, Robert Downey Jr.</b><br><b>Year: 2017</b><p align="justify">I hate to be labelled as a contrarian, but I didn't like <i>Spider-Man: Homecoming</i> as much as the majority of America did, and I'll try my best over the course of this review to explain why.  So you know, in the past I would have claimed that I didn't like "comic book movies", that they were poorly-made and far too focused on money over quality.  Through the years, I've learned to enjoy the genre for what it is, and Marvel movies specifically have won me over, partially because they are getting better and better.  The Avengers Universe is improving with each addition, and I especially appreciate the Captain America films (<i><a href="http://...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/72225">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Life (2017)</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/71930</link>
                <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:48:41 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Highly Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/71930"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1490892654.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/full/1490885716_2.jpg" width="650" height="433"></center><br><b>Director: Daniel Espinosa</b><br><b>Starring: Jake Gyllenhaal, Rebecca Ferguson, Ryan Reynolds</b><br><b>Year: 2017</b><p align="justify">While <i>Life</i> isn't quite <i><a href="http://archeravenue.net/movie-review-interstellar/">Interstellar</a></i>, it's also no <i><a href="http://archeravenue.net/movie-review-fantastic-four/">Fantastic Four</a></i>, falling somewhere in the middle as far as overall ranking and even genre.  It's not as cerebral as a sci-fi thinker, it's not as action-packed as a comic book thriller, but it has elements of both that it uses as it sees fit.  Ultimately, <i>Life</i> will be compared to <i>Alien</i>, a creature feature set in outer space, and although it won't quite live up to those standards, it also won't do them an injustice.  Where you...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/71930">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>The Magnificent Seven</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/71294</link>
                <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:40:09 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/71294"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1474385998.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/full/1474381914_1.jpg" width="650" height="406"></center><br><b>Director: Antoine Fuqua</b><br><b>Starring: Denzel Washington, Chris Pratt, Ethan Hawke</b><br><b>Year: 2016</b><p align="justify">Director Antoine Fuqua started his career off with a bang in 2001 with <i>Training Day</i>, a film in which Denzel Washington won Best Actor and Ethan Hawke was nominated for Best Supporting.  Since then, Fuqua's choices have gone from bad to worse, until his moderate success with <i><a href="http://archeravenue.net/movie-review-southpaw/">Southpaw</a></i> last year.  With <i>The Magnificent Seven</i>, he looks to redeem himself, teaming up with Washington &amp; Hawke once again in an effort to recapture the magic.  Adding in Chris Pratt for good measure isn't a bad idea either, since the hot-ticket actor is currently turning everything he touc...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/71294">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Sausage Party</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/71173</link>
                <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 21:57:42 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/71173"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1470952633.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/282/1470947991_1.jpg" width="400" height="266"></center><br><br>Animated films and TV shows have often received the reputation that they are made exclusively for children. However, many content creators are telling very adult stories through different forms of animation. This isn't a new concept, as <i>The Simpsons</i>, <i>South Park</i>, <i>Family Guy</i>, among others have been succeeding at this for years. In 2015, Charlie Kaufman released his tremendous <i>Anomalisa</i>, which went on to be the first R-rated film to be Oscar nominated in the animated category. Seth Rogen and his usual group have joined forces once again to bring out the most Seth Rogen movie that you could possibly imagine. Feel free to take that as a pro or con, depending upon your feelings of one of Hollywood's go-to people for comedy.<br><br>From the perspective of ...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/71173">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Ghostbusters (2016)</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/71126</link>
                <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 22:52:44 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Rent It</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/71126"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1468808480.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/full/1469046478_3.jpg" width="650" height="325"></center><br><b>Director: Paul Feig</b><br><b>Starring: Kristen Wiig, Melissa McCarthy, Kate McKinnon, Leslie Jones</b><br><b>Year: 2016</b><p align="justify"><i>Bridesmaids, The Heat, Spy</i>, and now <i>Ghostbusters</i>; Paul Feig has an obsession with Melissa McCarthy that can't be healthy, especially to those who don't find her funny in the slightest.  But in case you don't like <i>Mike &amp; Molly</i>, the <i>Ghostbusters</i> female remake that no one asked for also features <i>SNL</i> comediennes like Wiig &amp; McKinnon, with Cecily Strong waiting in the wings with a bit part.  Don't like modern <i>SNL</i> either?  Well then you might be out of luck.  This reboot relies very heavily on A) our love of the original series but 2) our ability to find these women &amp; their styles of c...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/71126">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>The Shallows</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/71087</link>
                <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 14:31:33 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Highly Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/71087"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1467210683.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/full/1467166897_3.jpg" width="650" height="433"></center><br><b>Director: Jaume Collet-Serra</b><br><b>Starring: Blake Lively</b><br><b>Year: 2016</b><p align="justify">The surprisingly must-see horror film of the year is here, and it's <i>The Shallows</i>.  Last year, that honor went to <i><a href="http://archeravenue.net/movie-review-it-follows/">It Follows</a></i>, which hopefully sparked a movement toward simplistic horror filmmaking, leaving the ghosts behind &amp; focusing on the pure terror of death.  Well, if you're looking for death, look no further than this blood-in-the-water fright fest, and just in time for your trip to the beach too.  If you watched the <a href="http://archeravenue.net/movie-trailer-shallows/">trailer</a> back in April, you could see that there was a possibility of something special here, though I doubt a...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/71087">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Concussion</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/70250</link>
                <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2015 03:18:39 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/70250"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1450840687.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/full/1450823327_1.jpg" width="650" height="380"></center><br><b>Director: Peter Landesman</b><br><b>Starring: Will Smith, Alec Baldwin, Albert Brooks</b><br><b>Year: 2015</b><p align="justify">Will Smith hasn't been in a good movie since <i>Men in Black</i> in 1997.  There, I said it, and it's mostly true.  Since then, he's done a lot of fun fluff, but nothing that stands out as great: <i>Wild Wild West, Men in Black II, Bad Boys II, I Robot, Hitch, I Am Legend, Hancock, Men in Black 3, <a href="http://archeravenue.net/movie-review-after-earth/">After Earth</a>, <a href="http://archeravenue.net/movie-review-focus/">Focus</a></i>.  And even his serious stuff has been more cheesy than quality: <i>Enemy of the State, Bagger Vance, Ali, The Pursuit of Happyness, Seven Pounds</i>.  My point is, Will Smith is an actor who we fell in love wit...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/70250">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Concussion</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/70091</link>
                <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:02:26 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Rent It</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/70091"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1447938119.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/282/1447900533_1.jpg" width="400" height="266"></center><br><br>It's no joke when Dr. Cyril Wecht (Albert Brooks) says that NFL owns a day of the week. While I've never been much of a sports man myself, there's no denying the love that fans have for the game. Columbia Pictures was correct in believing that this could make a good film, if executed correctly. Before seeing <i>Concussion</i>, my biggest question involved how writer/director Peter Landesman would depict the NFL. By the film's end, would the major sports company be portrayed as villainous or apologetic? While the film's concept is intriguing, it falls into the category of Oscar bait.<br><br><i>Concussion</i> is based on the true story of Nigerian immigrant Dr. Bennet Omalu (Will Smith). Having achieved his dream of moving to America, he works as a forensic neuropathologist. Whe...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/70091">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Spectre</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/70009</link>
                <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 16:32:12 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/70009"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1446686624.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/full/1446825543_1.jpg" width="650" height="406"></center><br><b>Director: Sam Mendes</b><br><b>Starring: Daniel Craig, Christoph Waltz, Lea Seydoux, Ralph Fiennes</b><br><b>Year: 2015</b><p align="justify">The evolution of the Daniel Craig James Bond has been darkly compelling since its inception, drawing audience back into a world that we seemed ready to let slip away after four goofy Pierce Brosnan portrayals nearly tanked the franchise.  Now Craig has four of his own Bond films under his belt, completely changing the tenor and cementing himself as the deepest James to date.  <i>Casino Royale</i> shocked audiences with its blonde hero, its gruesome nature, and its lack of standard quips, but we loved it for those exact reasons.  Unfortunately, <i>Quantum of Solace</i> was a complete letdown, muddling everything, confusing everyone, a...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/70009">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>The Walk (3D)</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/69785</link>
                <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:25:43 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Rent It</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/69785"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1443533125.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/282/1443510608_2.jpg" width="400" height="266"></center><br><br>Spectacle has always been an element of many different forms of art. In 1974, Philippe Petit displayed a beautiful act that ultimately popularized the Twin Towers in New York. By accomplishing a high-wire walk between these two buildings, he managed to make history. It must have been a magical experience to witness such an event in person, but this moment lives on through various forms of media. It was inevitable that this story would make it into a feature-length Hollywood studio project with a major star. It has taken on the title of <i>The Walk</i>, and it will be hitting theaters in various formats, including IMAX 3D.<br><br>Following Philippe Petit (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) through various stages of his life, the film tells of a man's journey to achieve his dream. After trav...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/69785">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Chappie</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/67875</link>
                <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 17:23:19 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/67875"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1425587822.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1425921055_1.jpg" width="400" height="225"></center><br><b>Director: Neill Blomkamp</b><br><b>Starring: Sharlto Copley, Dev Patel, Hugh Jackman</b><br><b>Year: 2015</b><p align="justify">It took balls to make <i>Chappie</i>.  In a genre that already pushes the envelope of believability, here is a sci-fi film that goes even further down the road of cinematic experimentation than most.  It's not the base story that's so original, that of an intelligent robot that melts our hearts with his surprising humanism.  We've seen that theme done very well in <i>Short Circuit</i>, a comedy classic that also brings about a few tears.  No, it's the surroundings that make <i>Chappie</i> a dangerous film, one that could go too far and burn every bridge in the process.  Set in South Africa, featuring rappers as actors, bringing an <i>Alien</i> vibe bac...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/67875">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Chappie</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/67814</link>
                <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 20:37:31 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Skip It</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/67814"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1425587822.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/282/1425586980_2.jpg" width="400" height="266"></center><br><br>Looking back at 2009, writer/director Neill Blomkamp generated a ton of buzz after releasing <i>District 9</i> with his co-writer Terri Tatchell. Fast forward a couple years, and he released <i>Elysium</i>, which I actually enjoyed more than most, but it didn't come close to the greatness that was his first feature film. Now, we have <i>Chappie</i>. Perhaps the most disappointing aspect of the picture is that it doesn't have a single original bolt in its entire cybernetic body. It looks like Blomkamp is on a steep decline, and nobody should have to watch that.<br><br>Taking place in the near future, all crime is handled by an oppressive mechanized police force. When developer Deon Wilson (Dev Patel) brings a police droid home to tweak the programming, he finds himself in betwe...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/67814">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Fury</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/66314</link>
                <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:13:08 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/66314"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1413328355.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1413467446_1.jpg" width="400" height="225"></center><br><b>Director: David Ayer</b><br><b>Starring: Brad Pitt, Logan Lerman, Shia LaBeouf</b><br><b>Year: 2014</b><p align="justify">What's not to like, right?  We all love a good WWII story; the 2nd World War kicks the 1st World War's ass, as far as on-screen appeal goes.  It was a time on the verge between modern &amp; archaic, a war against a solid evil, a "glorious" American-led fight that left the trenches behind and exposed itself in the open field of battle.  If that doesn't get your red-blooded heart pumping I don't know what will.  The point is, WWII made for good cinema, regardless of how terrible being on the front lines actually was.  As an audience, we love to watch the USA fight Nazi Germany; it feels very one-sided, good vs bad, like we were destined to win.  And would we l...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/66314">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Fury (2014)</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/66280</link>
                <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 23:12:53 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/66280"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1413328355.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/282/1413319284_2.jpg" width="400" height="266"></center><br><br>The war film has gone through a lot over the years. As more filmmakers continue to experiment with different stories, often involving our history, we're asked to view it from a different perspective. However, a large number of these pictures happen to take place during World War II. While some of these features prove to be pieces of cinematic brilliance, others come across as an absurdly superficial representation of war. Now, it's writer/director David Ayer's turn to strive for excellence in this ever-expanding genre. The filmmaker behind pictures such as <i>End of Watch</i> has definitely crafted something memorable with his incredible ability to have us sitting at the edge of our seats. However, it leaves us with something to be desired on the emotional side of things.<br><...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/66280">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>22 Jump Street</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/64916</link>
                <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2014 00:38:10 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Skip It</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/64916"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1402706284.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1402671514_1.jpg" width="400" height="225"></center><br><br><b>Director: Phil Lord, Christopher Miller</b><br><b>Starring: Jonah Hill, Channing Tatum, Ice Cube</b><br><b>Year: 2014</b><p align="justify">Before seeing <i>22 Jump Street</i>, you had better see <i>21</i>.  Often the sequel isn't exactly reliant on the original, but in this series the second plays heavily off the first.  And it's worth your time to go back, to check out the one that started the franchise, the film that launched itself off the classic TV series.  It's a funny movie; not too much more can be said about it.  It's not wonderful, but it gets plenty of laughs, relying on two pretty hilarious guys and some cool side characters to keep you chuckling throughout.  So watch the first one; I'd recommend it to anyone who likes slapstick, drug use, easy comedy.  But don...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/64916">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>22 Jump Street</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/64890</link>
                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2014 00:59:06 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Highly Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/64890"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1402534564.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center>	<img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/282/1402442573_2.jpg" width="400" height="266"></center><br><br>In 2012, directors Phil Lord and Christopher Miller released their hit comedy <i>21 Jump Street</i>. This comedy remains to be a hysterical motion picture that delivers a high laugh-per-minute ratio. This is a very difficult feat to achieve, since most comedies try too hard to win our affection. It's when a film makes it seem easy is when the magic strikes us. Lord and Miller are most certainly becoming forces to reckon with in Hollywood, as they manage to keep the laughs coming with one feature after another. Yet, it's no secret that sequels, especially those in this genre, are generally disappointing. One of the key elements to <i>22 Jump Street</i>'s success is how self-aware it is. The writers take this knowledge and use it as motivation.<br><br>After completing their mis...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/64890">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Pompeii (3D)</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/63712</link>
                <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:36:39 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Skip It</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/63712"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1392948558.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/282/1392711869_1.jpg" width="400" height="266"></center><br><br>Those who have heard the story about Pompeii know that it's actually quite intriguing to learn about. However, I'm having difficulty finding the reasoning behind making this into a full-length motion picture. There's absolutely no explanation other than to have an excuse to catch the attention of the masses with a huge amount of CG work during the eruption sequence. I'm pretty sure that's the exact point that got this green lit. If that wasn't bad enough, why not add a filmmaker who is known for putting motion pictures on the big screen that have viewers "face-palming" around the world? That man is Paul W.S. Anderson, and he's the individual responsible for bringing us flicks such as <i>AVP: Alien vs. Predator</i>, <i>Resident Evil</i>, and <i>The Three Musketeers</i>. If you'...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/63712">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>The Monuments Men</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/63717</link>
                <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 21:56:13 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Rent It</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/63717"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1391741009.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1392834565_1.jpg" width="400" height="300"></center><br><br><b>Director: George Clooney</b><br><b>Starring: George Clooney, Matt Damon, Cate Blanchett, Bill Murray, John Goodman, Bob Balaban, Jean Dujardin</b><br><b>Year: 2014</b><p align="justify">I guess it was just too good to be true.  When I first saw the trailer for <i>The Monuments Men</i> I was sure it would be a home run.  How could it fail, right?  One of the best cast lists I've ever seen, an incredibly captivating setting, a little humor to lighten the heavy mood.  The film had Oscar written all over it, until people starting seeing it.  Then the wide release was pushed back, the buzz surrounding the project started sounding more like boos, and every trailer I saw for it, other than the initial teaser, make the movie look worse and worse.  But I was already pot-committed, a...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/63717">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>RoboCop (2014)</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/63041</link>
                <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 03:16:41 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Rent It</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/63041"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1392261387.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/282/1392143800_1.jpg" width="400" height="266"></center><br><br>Regardless of whether you're aware of the fact or not, action films can have messages that audiences can relate to. While some of them are only about the huge explosions, - I'm looking at you <i>Transformers</i> franchise - others have actual social commentary that go along with the violence. A perfect example of this is the 1987 classic known as <i>RoboCop</i>. It caught the attention of moviegoers everywhere with its shocking depiction of brutal and graphic violence. However, it was anything but pointless. In fact, it created a conversation about how violent we are as a society, and how politics affect it. This sci-fi action motion picture has become a favorite of many film buffs around the globe, so it isn't very surprising that Columbia Pictures wanted to create a remake i...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/63041">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>The Monuments Men</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/63019</link>
                <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 02:45:07 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Highly Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/63019"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1391741014.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><p><p align="center"><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/177/1391623746_4.jpg" width="400" height="268"><p>George Clooney has long been considered the last great movie star, the true heir to the suave mantle of classic Hollywood actors like Cary Grant and William Holden. It should be no surprise then, that as a director, he has increasingly gravitated toward projects that hearken back to the Golden Age of moviemaking. Clooney is consistently bold in his acting choices, including extended relationships with both Steven Soderbergh and the Coen Bros.--and even there, he participated in Soderberg's <a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/54244/casablanca/"><i>Casablanca</i></a>-riff <a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/28227/good-german-the/"><i>The Good German</i></a> and worked with the Coens on the <a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/dvdsavant/s2186stur.html?___rd=1">Preston Sturges</...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/63019">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>The Monuments Men</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/63020</link>
                <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 02:45:07 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Rent It</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/63020"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1391741009.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/282/1391630942_1.jpg" width="400" height="266"></center><br><br>Some films get their release dates pushed back for various reasons. However, it's never a good impression to make with moviegoers. Whether reshoots are required or post-production is taking longer than expected, it usually implies that the film has problems. In the case of <i>The Monuments Men</i>, it was because the special effects weren't entirely finished, so the filmmakers requested for more time and to have it released in February 2014 rather than December 2013. Columbia Pictures was clearly hoping to aim for award season, so I'm betting that they were a bit disappointed when they had to push the release date back. How did the filmmakers manage to achieve this? Well, you can do almost anything you want when George Clooney assumes writer/director/producer/actor roles for t...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/63020">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>American Hustle</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/62891</link>
                <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 04:51:29 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Highly Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/62891"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1386851003.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1388433626_2.jpg" width="400" height="220"></center><br><br><b>Director: David O. Russell</b><br><b>Starring: Christian Bale, Amy Adams, Bradley Cooper, Jennifer Lawrence, Jeremy Renner</b><br><b>Year: 2013</b><p align="justify">This was the movie that I was the most excited about the entire year.  After all, it had all the parts in place to be a phenomenal film.  David O. Russell has proven that he is a great director with movies like <i>The Fighter</i> and <i>Silver Linings Playbook</i>.  They were Oscar caliber, audience favorites, and strong all-around.  The actors are a mix of proven veterans and up-and-coming talent: Bale &amp; Adams having worked together in <i>The Fighter</i>, Cooper &amp; Lawrence the dramatic duo of <i>Silver Linings Playbook</i>.  Add Jeremy Renner to the mix, an awesome 70s soundtrack, a cool con vibe, and ...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/62891">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>American Hustle</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/62854</link>
                <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 13:21:52 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">DVD Talk Collector Series</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/62854"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1386851003.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><p><p align="center"><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/177/1387346025_2.jpg" width="400" height="233"><p>There are two ways in which we generally use the word "hustle" these days. In one sense, to hustle someone is to trick or con them; in the other sense, it is to give it a lot of effort, to keep moving, and make things happen. Luckily, a third meaning, a dance from the disco era, has mostly disappeared--though, it does make for a pretty impressive scene in David O. Russell's newest movie, <i>American Hustle</i>. The disco perennial actually makes this movie three for three, meaning the director's follow-up to <a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/59817/silver-linings-playbook/"><i>Silver Linings Playbook</i></a> is a wily creature, one that moves swiftly and goes all over the place to tell a big story about some genuine United States hucksters.<p>Christian Bale, who was also i...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/62854">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>American Hustle</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/62829</link>
                <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:23:29 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Highly Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/62829"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1386851003.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/282/1386710377_2.jpg" width="400" height="266"></center><br><br>It feels as if this past year has been picked up and swept away by a powerful gust of wind. It has been an entire year since <i>Silver Linings Playbook</i> was released. Regardless, it's officially that time of year again! I'm not talking about Christmas, but about "Oscar season." This is when distributors begin releasing films as close to the Academy Awards as possible. While they want to give audiences time to see it before the awards, they want their film to be fresh on the silver screen when the voters begin to submit their ballots. Columbia Pictures will be distributing David O. Russell's <i>American Hustle</i> in limited release on December 13th, which will see a nationwide expansion on December 20th. Nobody is denying the inevitable truth that this picture is a lock for...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/62829">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Captain Phillips</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61791</link>
                <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:01:46 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61791"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1381449496.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/282/1381350170_1.jpg" width="400" height="266"></center><br><br>When it comes to filmmaking, there aren't very many things more powerful than when a feature is able to put a knot in your stomach. A lot of motion pictures require suspension of disbelief, but the element of reality has the ability to hit much harder. Even though <i>Captain Phillips</i> is a Hollywood feature, it still possesses quite a bit more oomph than the majority of the big thrillers that hit the silver screen each year. Director Paul Greengrass has been involved in his share of action flicks, but this type of intensity is rarely handled in Hollywood. However, this time it isn't a fictitious story, but is based upon a true story. A lot of audiences will compare this to Denmark's <i>A Hijacking</i>, but it shouldn't surprise you that this isn't as good. Regardless, you s...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61791">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Captain Phillips</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61794</link>
                <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:01:46 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Highly Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61794"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1381449500.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><p><p align="center"><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/177/1381352845_1.jpg" width="400" height="266"><p>What <a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/61748/gravity-imax-3d/"><i>Gravity</i></a> was to being lost in space, <i>Captain Phillips</i> is to being lost at sea. Or, at least, hijacked. (That upcoming Robert Redford movie, <i>All is Lost</i>, is the one about <i>really</i> being lost at sea.)<p>It's not an entirely facetious comparison. If you've yet to recover from the intensity of Alfonso Cuarón's astro thriller, you might want to consult a doctor before seeing Paul Greengrass' clenched-tight Tom Hanks vehicle.<p><i>Captain Phillips</i> is based on a true story from 2009 about an American cargo ship being taken over by Somali pirates. Hanks leads the picture as the Captain, and outside of a couple of character actors with very small roles, is the only recognizable face in...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61794">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Elysium</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61450</link>
                <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:37:36 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Rent It</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61450"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1375997867.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1376494551_3.jpg" width="400" height="200"></center><br><br><b>Director: Neill Blomkamp</b><br><b>Starring: Matt Damon, Jodie Foster, Sharlto Copley</b><br><b>Year: 2013</b><p align="justify">You can't talk about <i>Elysium</i> without first talking about <i>District 9</i>.  Done four years ago, it was Neill Blomkamp's first feature film, and it was an amazing success.  It got great reviews from both critics &amp; audiences, and I really liked it.  It was such an original way to make a point, using aliens to represent apartheid in South Africa, forcing the main character to physically transform, making audiences watch some horrible reality.  Sound familiar?  If you've heard much about <i>Elysium</i> you'll recognize a very similar plot and message; class warfare, metamorphosis, sci-fi action.  The two movies have a ton in common, which...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61450">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>Elysium</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61397</link>
                <pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 01:20:36 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61397"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1375997863.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/282/1375675965_1.jpg" width="400" height="266"></center><br><br>In 2009, writer/director Neill Blomkamp brought us the science fiction hit <i>District 9</i>. This genre isn't particularly my favorite, but I have always enjoyed the dynamics of a motion picture that explores a corrupt society. Blomkamp's newest picture <i>Elysium</i> most certainly carries some elements that have previously been explored, but this post-apocalyptic film has some tricks of its own. However, they're in short supply, as the majority of them have been utilized by several other filmmakers. Regardless of the movie's lack of originality, it's still able to entertain and keep its audience invested in the lead character. While this isn't the masterpiece that some moviegoers were hoping for, it still manages to be a worthwhile feature.<br><br>Set in the year 2154, the ...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61397">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>This Is the End</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61336</link>
                <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 19:51:23 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Highly Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61336"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1371002621.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1374680483_3.jpg" width="400" height="225"></center><br><br><b>Director: Evan Goldberg, Seth Rogen</b><br><b>Starring: Seth Rogen, James Franco, Jonah Hill</b><br><b>Year: 2013</b><p align="justify">When the trailer for <i>This Is the End</i> first came out I thought it looked pretty funny.  I figured if you liked <i>Superbad</i>, which I did, you'd like this one as well.  It has some of the same actors (Rogen, Hill, Cera) and the same style of raunchy comedy that revolves around bodily fluids and recreational drugs.  However, a major difference would be that in this movie the actors play themselves, with a ton of cameos thrown in for good measure.  So while I assumed that I'd find it funny, I also thought that it would fall short of better movies because it would lack that emotional base that we don't always notice but we usually need...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61336">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day (Director's Cut) (Blu-ray)</title>
                <category>Blu-ray</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61296</link>
                <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:54:16 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61296"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1373579621.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><p><b><u>THE FILM:</b></u></p><p><center><a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/274/full/1373254388_2.jpg" target="_blank"><img alt="" src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/274/full/1373254388_2.jpg" style="border: 0px solid ; width: 725px; height: 408px;"></a></center></p><p><center><b><i>Click an image to view Blu-ray screenshot with 1080p resolution.</b></i></center></p><p>It took director Troy Duffy ten years to make a sequel to his cult hit <a href="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/50495/boondock-saints-10th-anniversary-truth-justice-edition-the/"><i>The Boondock Saints</i></a>, which hardly saw a theatrical release in 1999 but made over $50 million in video sales and rentals.  <i>The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day</i> is only the director's second film; the direct result of the explosive backlash to Duffy's obnoxious behavior after scoring a high-profile deal with M...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61296">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>This Is the End</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61177</link>
                <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 02:03:48 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Highly Recommended</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61177"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1371002621.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/282/1370573171_2.jpg" width="400" height="266"></center><br><br>If the apocalypse were to take place, different people around the world would surely have varied reactions. Some would commit horrible crimes such as murder, while others would seek shelter with their closest friends and family members. The realization of the end of the world would be a shock to many, which could drive some to insanity. <i>This Is the End</i> explores how a group of celebrities deal with the apocalypse. However, they aren't all the closest of friends, as a few of them are complete enemies. This works as an excellent vehicle for a hysterical comedy, especially since the celebrities are playing themselves. The narrative itself might not entirely hold up, but it works in delivering laugh-out-loud gags that make it worth every penny of your admission ticket.<br><b...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61177">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
                    <item>
                                <title>After Earth</title>
                <category>Theatrical</category>
                <link>https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61172</link>
                <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:44:39 UTC</pubDate>
                <description>
                <![CDATA[
                                  <span class="rss:item">
               <class="posted">
               <b class="first">Skip It</b>
               <p><a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61172"><img src="//images.dvdtalk.com/covers/ts1370086903.jpg" vspace="10" hspace="10" align="left" border="0"></a><center><img src="http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/285/1370446657_1.jpg" width="400" height="225"></center><br><br><b>Director: M. Night Shyamalan</b><br><b>Starring: Will Smith, Jaden Smith</b><br><b>Year: 2013</b><p align="justify">It all started with Jaden Smith narrating with a Southern accent.  I'm not kidding.  I wish I was, because it was perhaps the worst fake accent I've ever heard, with Will Smith's being a close second.  I have no idea why they decided to try something so stupid; perhaps it had something to do with the Ranger Corps that saved humanity in the story, but it doesn't matter.  Whatever the reason, it was a bad idea, as was almost ever single idea in the entire movie.  When I first saw the trailer I was excited.  I wanted Shyamalan to get back to directing good movies, I wanted Will Smith to be cool like he used to be, and I wanted an awesome sci-fi movie about evolut...<a href="https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/review/61172">Read the entire review</a></p>
</p></b></i> </span>

                    ]]>
                </description>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>